A Survey on Activity Detection and Classification Using Wearable Sensors

被引:290
作者
Cornacchia, Maria [1 ]
Ozcan, Koray [1 ]
Zheng, Yu [1 ]
Velipasalar, Senem [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Wearable; sensors; survey; activity detection; activity classification; monitoring; ONLINE ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; FALL DETECTION; REAL-TIME; TRIAXIAL ACCELEROMETER; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ALGORITHM; MOTION; SPORTS; MULTISENSOR; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/JSEN.2016.2628346
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Activity detection and classification are very important for autonomous monitoring of humans for applications, including assistive living, rehabilitation, and surveillance. Wearable sensors have found wide-spread use in recent years due to their ever-decreasing cost, ease of deployment and use, and ability to provide continuous monitoring as opposed to sensors installed at fixed locations. Since many smart phones are now equipped with a variety of sensors, such as accelerometer, gyroscope, and camera, it has become more feasible to develop activity monitoring algorithms employing one or more of these sensors with increased accessibility. We provide a complete and comprehensive survey on activity classification with wearable sensors, covering a variety of sensing modalities, including accelerometer, gyroscope, pressure sensors, and camera-and depth-based systems. We discuss differences in activity types tackled by this breadth of sensing modalities. For example, accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer systems have a history of addressing whole body motion or global type activities, whereas camera systems provide the context necessary to classify local interactions, or interactions of individuals with objects. We also found that these single sensing modalities laid the foundation for hybrid works that tackle a mix of global and local interaction-type activities. In addition to the type of sensors and type of activities classified, we provide details on each wearable system that include on-body sensor location, employed learning approach, and extent of experimental setup. We further discuss where the processing is performed, i.e., local versus remote processing, for different systems. This is one of the first surveys to provide such breadth of coverage across different wearable sensor systems for activity classification.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 403
页数:18
相关论文
共 221 条
  • [1] Aghazadeh O., 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), P3297, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995731
  • [2] Disposable Smart lab on a chip for point-of-care clinical diagnostics
    Ahn, CH
    Choi, JW
    Beaucage, G
    Nevin, JH
    Lee, JB
    Puntambekar, A
    Lee, JY
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2004, 92 (01) : 154 - 173
  • [3] Alshurafa Nabil., 2013, Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2013 IEEE International Conference on, P1
  • [4] Amft O, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3660, P56
  • [5] Andreu J, 2011, IEEE INT CONF FUZZY, P2786
  • [6] Anguita D, 2013, J UNIVERS COMPUT SCI, V19, P1295
  • [7] Anjum A, 2013, 2013 IEEE CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC), P914, DOI 10.1109/CCNC.2013.6488584
  • [8] [Anonymous], P 20 SIGN PROC COMM
  • [9] [Anonymous], SENS APPL S SAS 2015
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2005, AAAI