Large subcortical infarcts - Clinical features, risk factors, and long-term prognosis compared with cortical and small deep infarcts

被引:13
作者
Halkes, Patricia H. A.
Kappelle, L. Jaap
van Gijn, Jan
van Wijk, Iris
Koudstaal, Peter J.
Algra, Ale
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Rudolf Magnus Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Rehabil Ctr De Hoogstraat, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
classification; epidemiology; stroke; ischemic;
D O I
10.1161/01.STR.0000226993.88307.ff
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose-In this study we compared risk factors, clinical features, and stroke recurrence in a large series of patients with large subcortical, cortical, or small deep infarcts. Methods-Patients with a transient or minor ischemic attack (modified Rankin Scale grade of <= 3) who had a single relevant supratentorial infarct of presumed noticardioembolic origin on CT were classified as suffering from a large subcortical (n = 120), small deep (n = 324), or cortical (n = 211) infarct. Mean follow-up was 8 years. Rates of recurrent stroke were compared with Cox regression. Results-The clinical deficits caused by large subcortical infarcts resembled either those of a cortical or those of a small deep infarct. Risk factor profiles were similar in the 3 groups. The rate of recurrent stroke in patients with a large subcortical infarct (25/120; 21%) did not differ from that of patients with a cortical infarct (46/211; 22%) or with a small deep infarct (60/324; 19%). After adjustment for age, sex, and vascular risk factors, hazard ratios for recurrent stroke of large subcortical and cortical infarcts were 1.05 (95% CI, 0.65 to 1.70) and 1.17 (95% CI, 0.79 to 1.73), respectively, compared with small deep infarcts. Conclusions-Clinical features, risk factor profiles, and stroke recurrence rate in patients with a large subcortical infarct only differ slightly from those in patients with small deep or cortical infarcts.
引用
收藏
页码:1828 / 1832
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   CLASSIFICATION AND NATURAL-HISTORY OF CLINICALLY IDENTIFIABLE SUBTYPES OF CEREBRAL INFARCTION [J].
BAMFORD, J ;
SANDERCOCK, P ;
DENNIS, M ;
BURN, J ;
WARLOW, C .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8756) :1521-1526
[2]   THE PLURALITY OF SUBCORTICAL INFARCTION [J].
BOGOUSSLAVSKY, J .
STROKE, 1992, 23 (05) :629-631
[3]   LARGE STRIATOCAPSULAR INFARCTS - CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND PATHOGENESIS IN COMPARISON WITH LACUNAR AND CORTICAL INFARCTS [J].
BOITEN, J ;
LODDER, J .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 86 (03) :298-303
[4]   Underestimation of the early risk of recurrent stroke - Evidence of the need for a standard definition [J].
Coull, AJ ;
Rothwell, PM .
STROKE, 2004, 35 (08) :1925-1929
[5]   Stroke subtype and mortality: a follow-up study in 998 patients with a first cerebral infarct [J].
de Jong, G ;
van Raak, L ;
Kessels, F ;
Lodder, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) :262-268
[6]  
DONNAN GA, 1991, BRAIN, V114, P51
[7]  
*DUTCH TIA STUD GR, 1988, STORKE, V19, P521
[8]   Stroke mechanisms and clinical presentation in large subcortical infarctions [J].
Horowitz, DR ;
Tuhrim, S .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (06) :1538-1541
[9]   Comparing risks of death and recurrent vascular events between lacunar and non-lacunar infarction [J].
Jackson, C ;
Sudlow, C .
BRAIN, 2005, 128 :2507-2517
[10]   Are lacunar strokes really different? A systematic review of differences in risk factor profiles between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts [J].
Jackson, C ;
Sudlow, C .
STROKE, 2005, 36 (04) :891-901