Increasing maximum tumor dose to manage range uncertainties in IMPT treatment planning

被引:10
作者
Petit, Steven [1 ]
Seco, Joao [2 ,3 ]
Kooy, Hanne [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
MODULATED PROTON THERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; RADIOTHERAPY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/58/20/7329
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The accuracy of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is sensitive to range uncertainties. Geometric margins, as dosimetric surrogates, are ineffective and robust optimization strategies are needed. These, however, lead to increased normal tissue dose. We explore here how this dose increase can be reduced by increasing the maximum tumor dose instead. We focus on range uncertainties, modeled by scaling the stopping powers 5% up (undershoot) or down (overshoot) compared to the nominal scenario. Robust optimization optimizes for target dose conformity in the most likely scenario, not the worst, while constraining target coverage for the worst-case scenario. Non-robust plans are also generated. Different maximum target doses are applied (105% versus 120% versus 140%) to investigate the effect on normal tissue dose reduction. The method is tested on a homogeneous and a lung phantom and on a liver patient. Target D99 of the robust plans equals the prescription dose of 60 GyE(4) for all scenarios, but decreases to 36 GyE for the non-robust plans. The mean normal tissue dose in a 2 cm ring around the target is 11% to 31% higher for the robust plans. This increase can be reduced to -8% and 3% (compared to the non-robust plan) by allowing a maximum tumor dose of 120% instead of 105%. Thus robustness leads to more normal tissue dose, but it can be compensated by allowing a higher maximum tumor dose.
引用
收藏
页码:7329 / 7341
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Is it necessary to plan with safety margins for actively scanned proton therapy?
    Albertini, F.
    Hug, E. B.
    Lomax, A. J.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (14) : 4399 - 4413
  • [2] [Anonymous], 0618 RTOG
  • [3] Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Chen, Wei
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Trofimov, Alexei
    Madden, Thomas
    Kooy, Hanne
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    Craft, David
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (03) : 591 - 608
  • [4] A fast optimization algorithm for multicriteria intensity modulated proton therapy planning
    Chen, Wei
    Craft, David
    Madden, Thomas M.
    Zhang, Kewu
    Kooy, Hanne M.
    Herman, Gabor T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (09) : 4938 - 4945
  • [5] Four-dimensional proton treatment planning for lung tumors
    Engelsman, M
    Rietzel, E
    Kooy, HM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (05): : 1589 - 1595
  • [6] Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy
    Fredriksson, Albin
    Forsgren, Anders
    Hardemark, Bjorn
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1672 - 1684
  • [7] Recommendations for implementing stereotactic radiotherapy in peripheral stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: report from the Quality Assurance Working Party of the randomised phase III ROSEL study
    Hurkmans, Coen W.
    Cuijpers, Johan P.
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    Widder, Joachim
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    Schuring, Danny
    Senan, Suresh
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2009, 4
  • [8] ICRU, 1999, 62 ICRU, V62
  • [9] Scanned proton radiotherapy for mobile targets-the effectiveness of re-scanning in the context of different treatment planning approaches and for different motion characteristics
    Knopf, Antje-Christin
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Lomax, Antony
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 56 (22) : 7257 - 7271
  • [10] Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy
    Liu, Wei
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Li, Yupeng
    Mohan, Radhe
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) : 1079 - 1091