Efficiency and Driving Factors of Green Development of Tourist Cities Based on Ecological Footprint

被引:16
作者
Shi, Yanmin [1 ]
Shao, Chaofeng [2 ]
Zhang, Zheyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Huaibei Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Huaibei 235000, Peoples R China
[2] Nankai Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Tianjin 300071, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
tourist cities; ecological footprint; panel analysis; cluster analysis; TIME-SERIES; CHINA; SUSTAINABILITY; URBANIZATION; PREDICTION; SECURITY; TRACKING; CARBON;
D O I
10.3390/su12208589
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For tourist cities, the ecological footprint not only affects tourism competitiveness but also affects green development. This paper adopted an improved ecological footprint accounting model, used a series of relevant indicators of ecological footprint to compare the green development efficiency, and explored the main driving factors of the per capita ecological footprint and city classification of 16 major tourist cities in China from 2000 to 2017. The results show that the green development efficiency of the studied tourist cities still needs to be improved. Secondly, the panel data analysis shows that the proportion of the primary industry in GDP, the proportion of the secondary industry in GDP, the per capita investment in fixed assets, and the length of highways per 10,000 people can increase the per capita ecological footprint. Then, the cluster analysis divides the selected tourist cities into four categories, and different types of cities need to be managed differently. Finally, this paper puts forward corresponding suggestions to improve the quality of the green development of selected tourist cities. The in-depth study of the ecological footprint in this paper will provide a scientific basis for tourist cities to promote green economic growth that considers ecological footprint and GDP and achieve sustainable development of tourism.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 23
页数:23
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, STAT RES, DOI DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-4565.2007.04.003
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, INVESTING NATURAL CA
[3]   Urban tourism research: Recent progress and current paradoxes [J].
Ashworth, Gregory ;
Page, Stephen J. .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2011, 32 (01) :1-15
[4]  
Benckendorff P. J., 2003, Journal of Travel Research, V42, P24, DOI 10.1177/0047287503253948
[5]   Ecological Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment in the sustainability assessment of tourism activities [J].
Castellani, Valentina ;
Sala, Serenella .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 16 :135-147
[6]  
Chambers N., 2000, Sharing Nature's Interest: Ecological footprints as an indicator of sustainability
[7]   Ecological footprint of the Chinese population, environment and development [J].
Chen, DJ ;
Cheng, GD ;
Xu, ZM ;
Zhang, ZQ .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 31 (01) :63-68
[8]  
Dietz T, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P13, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[13:DTHEF]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   Sustainability of the use of natural capital in a city: Measuring the size and depth of urban ecological and water footprints [J].
Fang, Kai ;
Zhang, Qifeng ;
Yu, Huajun ;
Wang, Yutao ;
Dong, Liang ;
Shi, Lei .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 631-632 :476-484