A new method to estimate clumping index integrating gap fraction averaging with the analysis of gap size distribution

被引:16
作者
Chianucci, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Zou, Jie [3 ]
Leng, Peng [3 ]
Zhuang, Yinguo [3 ]
Ferrara, Carlotta [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Consiglio Ric Agr & Anal Econ Agr, Res Ctr Agr & Environm, Via Navicella 2-4, I-00184 Rome, Italy
[2] Consiglio Ric Agr & Anal Econ Agr, Res Ctr Forestry & Wood, Viale Santa Margherita 80, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
[3] Fuzhou Univ, Key Lab Data Min & Informat Sharing, Minist Educ, Spatial Informat Res Ctr Fujian Prov, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
leaf area index; canopy nonrandomness; hemispherical photography; ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator; orness; LEAF-AREA INDEX; DIGITAL HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS; CORRECT ESTIMATION; CANOPY PROPERTIES; RADIATION; FORESTS; ERRORS; RATIO;
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-2018-0213
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Estimates of clumping index (Omega) are required to improve the indirect estimation of leaf area index (L) from optical field-based instruments such as digital hemispherical photography (DHP). A widely used method allows estimation of Omega from DHP using simple gap fraction averaging formulas (LX). This method is simple and effective but has the disadvantage of being sensitive to the spatial scale (i.e., the azimuth segment size in DHP) used for averaging and canopy density. In this study, we propose a new method to estimate Omega ( LXG) based on ordered weighted gap fraction averaging (OWA) formulas, which addresses the disadvantages of LX and also accounts for gap size distribution. The new method was tested in 11 broadleaved forest stands in Italy; Omega estimated from LXG was compared with other commonly used clumping correction methods (LX, CC, and CLX). Results showed that LXG yielded more accurate Omega estimates, which were also more correlated with the values obtained from the gap size distribution methods (CC and CLX) than Omega obtained from LX. Leaf area index estimates, adjusted by LXG, are only 5%-6% lower than direct measurements obtained from litter traps, while other commonly used clumping correction methods yielded more underestimation.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 479
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]   Estimation of leaf area index in eucalypt forest using digital photography [J].
Macfarlane, Craig ;
Hoffman, Megan ;
Eamus, Derek ;
Kerp, Naomi ;
Higginson, Simon ;
McMurtrie, Ross ;
Adams, Mark .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2007, 143 (3-4) :176-188
[32]   A FORMULA FOR AVERAGE FOLIAGE DENSITY [J].
MILLER, JB .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1967, 15 (01) :141-&
[33]   THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF FREQUENCY OF GAPS IN PLANT STANDS [J].
NILSON, T .
AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 1971, 8 (01) :25-+
[34]   Simulation of statistical characteristics of gap distribution in forest stands [J].
Nilson, Tiit ;
Kuusk, Andres ;
Lang, Mait ;
Pisek, Jan ;
Kodar, Ave .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2011, 151 (07) :895-905
[35]   Comparison of methods for measuring gap size distribution and canopy nonrandomness at Jarvselja RAMI (RAdiation transfer Model Intercomparison) test sites [J].
Pisek, Jan ;
Lang, Mait ;
Nilson, Tiit ;
Korhonen, Lauri ;
Karu, Helen .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2011, 151 (03) :365-377
[36]   On the correct estimation of effective leaf area index: Does it reveal information on clumping effects? [J].
Ryu, Youngryel ;
Nilson, Tiit ;
Kobayashi, Hideki ;
Sonnentag, Oliver ;
Law, Beverly E. ;
Baldocchi, Dennis D. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2010, 150 (03) :463-472
[37]   Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography [J].
van Gardingen, PR ;
Jackson, GE ;
Hernandez-Daumas, S ;
Russell, G ;
Sharp, L .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1999, 94 (3-4) :243-257
[38]   Integrating clumping effects in forest canopy structure: an assessment through hemispherical photographs [J].
Walter, JMN ;
Fournier, RA ;
Soudani, K ;
Meyer, E .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 29 (03) :388-410
[39]   Review of methods for in situ leaf area index (LAI) determination Part II. Estimation of LAI, errors and sampling [J].
Weiss, M ;
Baret, F ;
Smith, GJ ;
Jonckheere, I ;
Coppin, P .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2004, 121 (1-2) :37-53
[40]   The ratio of the arithmetic to the geometric mean: A cross-entropy interpretation [J].
Woodhouse, IH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2001, 39 (01) :188-189