Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres

被引:9
|
作者
Walker, Zoe [1 ,2 ]
Bartley, Gary [1 ,2 ]
Hague, Christina [3 ]
Kelly, Daniel [4 ]
Navarro, Clara [5 ]
Rogers, Jane [1 ,2 ]
South, Christopher [5 ]
Temple, Simon [4 ]
Whitehurst, Philip [3 ]
Chuter, Robert [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Coventry, Med Phys, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, England
[2] Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, England
[3] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Med Phys & Engn, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, England
[4] NHS Fdn Trust, Clatterbridge Canc Ctr, Phys Dept, Clatterbridge Rd, Bebington CH63 4JY, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Med Phys, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Fac Biol Med & Heath, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr,Div Canc Sci, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, England
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 24卷
关键词
Auto-contouring; Deep learning contouring; Multi-centre; Organs at risk; RISK SEGMENTATION; AUTO-SEGMENTATION; NECK ORGANS; ATLAS; HEAD; AUTOSEGMENTATION; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system.Materials and methods: Computed tomography scans of 123 prostate and 310 head and neck patients were evaluated. Besides one head and neck model, generic DLC models were used. Contouring time using centres' existing clinical methods and contour editing time after DLC were compared. Timing was evaluated using paired and non-paired studies. Commercial software or in-house scripts assessed dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA). One centre assessed head and neck inter-observer variability.Results: The mean contouring time saved for prostate structures using DLC compared to the existing clinical method was 5.9 +/- 3.5 min. The best agreement was shown for the femoral heads (median DSC 0.92 +/- 0.03, median DTA 1.5 +/- 0.3 mm) and the worst for the rectum (median DSC 0.68 +/- 0.04, median DTA 4.6 +/- 0.6 mm). The mean contouring time saved for head and neck structures using DLC was 16.2 +/- 8.6 min. For one centre there was no DLC time-saving compared to an atlas-based method. DLC contours reduced inter-observer vari-ability compared to manual contours for the brainstem, left parotid gland and left submandibular gland.Conclusions: Generic prostate and head and neck DLC models can provide time-savings which can be assessed with paired or non-paired studies to integrate with clinical workload. Reducing inter-observer variability po-tential has been shown.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Review of Deep Learning Based Automatic Segmentation for Lung Cancer Radiotherapy
    Liu, Xi
    Li, Kai-Wen
    Yang, Ruijie
    Geng, Li-Sheng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [22] Automatic delineation of the clinical target volume and organs at risk by deep learning for rectal cancer postoperative radiotherapy q
    Song, Ying
    Hu, Junjie
    Wu, Qiang
    Xu, Feng
    Nie, Shihong
    Zhao, Yaqin
    Bai, Sen
    Yi, Zhang
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 145 : 186 - 192
  • [23] Evaluating deep learning auto-contouring for lung radiation therapy: A review of accuracy, variability, efficiency and dose, in target volumes and organs at risk
    Moran, Keeva
    Poole, Claire
    Barrett, Sarah
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 33
  • [24] Deep learning model for automatic contouring of cardiovascular substructures on radiotherapy planning CT images: Dosimetric validation and reader study based clinical acceptability testing
    Fernandes, Miguel Garrett
    Bussink, Johan
    Stam, Barbara
    Wijsman, Robin
    Schinagl, Dominic A. X.
    Monshouwer, Rene
    Teuwen, Jonas
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 165 : 52 - 59
  • [25] Application of deep learning to auto -delineation of target volumes and organs at risk in radiotherapy
    Chen, M.
    Wu, S.
    Zhao, W.
    Zhou, Y.
    Zhou, Y.
    Wang, G.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2022, 26 (03): : 494 - 501
  • [26] Patient-specific daily updated deep learning auto-segmentation for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Baosheng
    Zhu, Jian
    Peng, Yinglin
    Li, Chengze
    Zhu, Jennifer
    Zhou, Qichao
    Yin, Yong
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 177 : 222 - 230
  • [27] Deep learning-assisted interactive contouring of lung cancer: Impact on contouring time and consistency
    Trimpl, Michael J.
    Campbell, Sorcha
    Panakis, Niki
    Ajzensztejn, Daniel
    Burke, Emma
    Ellis, Shawn
    Johnstone, Philippa
    Doyle, Emma
    Towers, Rebecca
    Higgins, Geoffrey
    Bernard, Claire
    Hustinx, Roland
    Vallis, Katherine A.
    Stride, Eleanor P. J.
    Gooding, Mark J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 200
  • [28] The Application and Development of Deep Learning in Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review
    Huang, Danju
    Bai, Han
    Wang, Li
    Hou, Yu
    Li, Lan
    Xia, Yaoxiong
    Yan, Zhirui
    Chen, Wenrui
    Chang, Li
    Li, Wenhui
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2021, 20
  • [29] External validation of deep learning-based contouring of head and neck organs at risk
    Brunenberg, Ellen J. L.
    Steinseifer, Isabell K.
    van den Bosch, Sven
    Kaanders, Johannes H. A. M.
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    Gooding, Mark J.
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    Monshouwer, Rene
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 : 8 - 15
  • [30] Contouring quality assurance methodology based on multiple geometric features against deep learning auto-segmentation
    Duan, Jingwei
    Bernard, Mark E.
    Castle, James R.
    Feng, Xue
    Wang, Chi
    Kenamond, Mark C.
    Chen, Quan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (05) : 2715 - 2732