Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Learning Contouring across Multiple Radiotherapy Centres

被引:9
|
作者
Walker, Zoe [1 ,2 ]
Bartley, Gary [1 ,2 ]
Hague, Christina [3 ]
Kelly, Daniel [4 ]
Navarro, Clara [5 ]
Rogers, Jane [1 ,2 ]
South, Christopher [5 ]
Temple, Simon [4 ]
Whitehurst, Philip [3 ]
Chuter, Robert [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Coventry, Med Phys, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, England
[2] Warwickshire NHS Trust, Clifford Bridge Rd, Coventry CV2 2DX, England
[3] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Med Phys & Engn, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, England
[4] NHS Fdn Trust, Clatterbridge Canc Ctr, Phys Dept, Clatterbridge Rd, Bebington CH63 4JY, England
[5] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Med Phys, Egerton Rd, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Fac Biol Med & Heath, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr,Div Canc Sci, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, England
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 24卷
关键词
Auto-contouring; Deep learning contouring; Multi-centre; Organs at risk; RISK SEGMENTATION; AUTO-SEGMENTATION; NECK ORGANS; ATLAS; HEAD; AUTOSEGMENTATION; IMPLEMENTATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2022.11.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Deep learning contouring (DLC) has the potential to decrease contouring time and variability of organ contours. This work evaluates the effectiveness of DLC for prostate and head and neck across four radiotherapy centres using a commercial system.Materials and methods: Computed tomography scans of 123 prostate and 310 head and neck patients were evaluated. Besides one head and neck model, generic DLC models were used. Contouring time using centres' existing clinical methods and contour editing time after DLC were compared. Timing was evaluated using paired and non-paired studies. Commercial software or in-house scripts assessed dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and distance to agreement (DTA). One centre assessed head and neck inter-observer variability.Results: The mean contouring time saved for prostate structures using DLC compared to the existing clinical method was 5.9 +/- 3.5 min. The best agreement was shown for the femoral heads (median DSC 0.92 +/- 0.03, median DTA 1.5 +/- 0.3 mm) and the worst for the rectum (median DSC 0.68 +/- 0.04, median DTA 4.6 +/- 0.6 mm). The mean contouring time saved for head and neck structures using DLC was 16.2 +/- 8.6 min. For one centre there was no DLC time-saving compared to an atlas-based method. DLC contours reduced inter-observer vari-ability compared to manual contours for the brainstem, left parotid gland and left submandibular gland.Conclusions: Generic prostate and head and neck DLC models can provide time-savings which can be assessed with paired or non-paired studies to integrate with clinical workload. Reducing inter-observer variability po-tential has been shown.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical implementation of deep-learning based auto-contouring tools-Experience of three French radiotherapy centers
    Robert, C.
    Munoz, A.
    Moreau, D.
    Mazurier, J.
    Sidorski, G.
    Gasnier, A.
    Beldjoudi, G.
    Gregoire, V
    Deutsch, E.
    Meyer, P.
    Simon, L.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2021, 25 (6-7): : 607 - 616
  • [2] Feasibility evaluation of novel AI-based deep-learning contouring algorithm for radiotherapy
    Bustos, Luis Maduro A.
    Sarkar, Abhirup
    Doyle, Laura A.
    Andreou, Kelly
    Noonan, Jodie
    Nurbagandova, Diana
    Shah, SunJay A.
    Irabor, Omoruyi Credit
    Mourtada, Firas
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (11):
  • [3] Real-world analysis of manual editing of deep learning contouring in the thorax region
    Vaassen, Femke
    Boukerroui, Djamal
    Looney, Padraig
    Canters, Richard
    Verhoeven, Karolien
    Peeters, Stephanie
    Lubken, Indra
    Mannens, Jolein
    Gooding, Mark J.
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 22 : 104 - 110
  • [4] Human factors in the clinical implementation of deep learning-based automated contouring of pelvic organs at risk for MRI-guided radiotherapy
    Abdulkadir, Yasin
    Luximon, Dishane
    Morris, Eric
    Chow, Phillip
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Mikaeilian, Argin
    Lamb, James M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (10) : 5969 - 5977
  • [5] A clinical and time savings evaluation of a deep learning automatic contouring algorithm
    Ginn, John S.
    Gay, Hiram A.
    Hilliard, Jessica
    Shah, Jainil
    Mistry, Nilesh
    Moehler, Christian
    Hugo, Geoffrey D.
    Hao, Yao
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2023, 48 (01) : 55 - 60
  • [6] Automatic contouring of normal tissues with deep learning for preclinical radiation studies
    Lappas, Georgios
    Wolfs, Cecile J. A.
    Staut, Nick
    Lieuwes, Natasja G.
    Biemans, Rianne
    van Hoof, Stefan J.
    Dubois, Ludwig J.
    Verhaegen, Frank
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (04)
  • [7] Implementation of a Commercial Deep Learning-Based Auto Segmentation Software in Radiotherapy: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Impact on Workflow
    Radici, Lorenzo
    Ferrario, Silvia
    Borca, Valeria Casanova
    Cante, Domenico
    Paolini, Marina
    Piva, Cristina
    Baratto, Laura
    Franco, Pierfrancesco
    La Porta, Maria Rosa
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [8] Assessment of manual adjustment performed in clinical practice following deep learning contouring for head and neck organs at risk in radiotherapy
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    Boukerroui, Djamal
    Oliveira, Jorge
    Looney, Padraig
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Both, Stefan
    Gooding, Mark J.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 16 : 54 - 60
  • [9] Deep Learning Architecture to Improve Edge Accuracy of Auto-Contouring for Head and Neck Radiotherapy
    Gifford, Ryan
    Jhawar, Sachin R. R.
    Krening, Samantha
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (13)
  • [10] Clinical implementation of deep learning contour autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy
    Cha, Elaine
    Elguindi, Sharif
    Onochie, Ifeanyirochukwu
    Gorovets, Daniel
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Zelefsky, Michael
    Gillespie, Erin F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 : 1 - 7