A proof-of-concept application of a novel scoring approach for personalized medicine in multiple sclerosis

被引:16
|
作者
Pellegrini, Fabio [1 ]
Copetti, Massimiliano [2 ]
Bovis, Francesca [3 ]
Cheng, David [4 ]
Hyde, Robert [1 ]
de Moor, Carl [5 ]
Kieseier, Bernd C. [5 ,6 ]
Sormani, Maria Pia [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Biogen Int GmbH, Neuhofstr 30, CH-6340 Baar, Switzerland
[2] Fdn IRCCS Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, Unit Biostat, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
[3] Univ Genoa, Dept Hlth Sci DISSAL, Genoa, Italy
[4] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[5] Biogen Inc, Cambridge, MA USA
[6] Heinrich Heine Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Dusseldorf, Germany
[7] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Genoa, Italy
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; proof-of-concept; personalized medicine; individual treatment response; dimethyl fumarate; treatment algorithms; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED PHASE-3; EVALUATING MARKERS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; ORAL BG-12; COX MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; PREDICTION; SUBGROUPS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/1352458519849513
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Stratified medicine methodologies based on subgroup analyses are often insufficiently powered. More powerful personalized medicine approaches are based on continuous scores. Objective: We deployed a patient-specific continuous score predicting treatment response in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: Data from two independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were used to build and validate an individual treatment response (ITR) score, regressing annualized relapse rates (ARRs) on a set of baseline predictors. Results: The ITR score for the combined treatment groups versus placebo detected differential clinical response in both RCTs. High responders in one RCT had a cross-validated ARR ratio of 0.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.13-0.55) versus 0.62 (95% CI = 0.47-0.83) for all other responders (heterogeneityp = 0.038) and were validated in the other RCT, with the corresponding ARR ratios of 0.31 (95% CI = 0.18-0.56) and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.47-0.79; heterogeneityp = 0.036). The strongest treatment effect modifiers were the Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary, age, Visual Function Test 2.5%, prior MS treatment and Expanded Disability Status Scale. Conclusion: Our modelling strategy detects and validates an ITR score and opens up avenues for building treatment response calculators that are also applicable in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1064 / 1073
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proof-of-concept trial of a novel dietary supplement, multicafe®, for fatigue in multiple sclerosis
    Dos Passos, G.
    Bressanim, A.
    Dos Santos, A. D. C.
    Trevisan, C.
    Tavares, G.
    Goncalves, L.
    Canton, L. E.
    Olmi, M.
    Urbanetto, M.
    Teixeira, C.
    Azzolin, V.
    Da Cruz, I.
    Sato, D.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (3_SUPPL) : 100 - 101
  • [2] Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy and Multiple Sclerosis: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    Cordano, Christian
    Armezzani, Annalisa
    Veroni, Jacopo
    Pardini, Matteo
    Sassos, Davide
    Infante, Maria Teresa
    Tacchino, Andrea
    Lapucci, Caterina
    Cellerino, Maria
    Calabro, Valentina
    Ciullo, Luigi
    Nourbakhsh, Bardia
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION, 2018, 118 (08): : 531 - 536
  • [3] Effects on Corticospinal Tract Homology of Faremus Personalized Neuromodulation Relieving Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: A Proof-of-Concept Study
    Bertoli, Massimo
    Tataranni, Angela
    Porziani, Susanna
    Pasqualetti, Patrizio
    Gianni, Eugenia
    Grifoni, Joy
    L'Abbate, Teresa
    Armonaite, Karolina
    Conti, Livio
    Cancelli, Andrea
    Cottone, Carlo
    Marinozzi, Franco
    Bini, Fabiano
    Cecconi, Federico
    Tecchio, Franca
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (04)
  • [5] Remyelination researchers regroup after proof-of-concept setback in multiple sclerosis
    Asher Mullard
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2016, 15 : 519 - 521
  • [6] Benefits of functional assays in personalized cancer medicine: more than just a proof-of-concept
    du Puch, Christophe Bounaix Morand
    Vanderstraete, Mathieu
    Giraud, Stephanie
    Lautrette, Christophe
    Christou, Niki
    Mathonnet, Muriel
    THERANOSTICS, 2021, 11 (19): : 9538 - 9556
  • [7] Erratum: Remyelination researchers regroup after proof-of-concept setback in multiple sclerosis
    Asher Mullard
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2016, 15 : 660 - 660
  • [8] Personalized prediction of rehabilitation outcomes in multiple sclerosis: a proof-of-concept using clinical data, digital health metrics, and machine learning
    Christoph M. Kanzler
    Ilse Lamers
    Peter Feys
    Roger Gassert
    Olivier Lambercy
    Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2022, 60 : 249 - 261
  • [9] A clinical examination of OPTIMAL theory application in people with multiple sclerosis: a proof-of-concept study and implications for rehabilitation practice
    Khalaji, Zahra
    Salehi, Hamid
    Alhosseini, Maryam Nezakat
    Lewthwaite, Rebecca
    Wulf, Gabriele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 2025, 48 (01) : 18 - 24
  • [10] Application of the Fuzzy Logic Concept in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite for Scoring the Progress of Multiple Sclerosis
    Raza, Mohsin
    Razjouyan, Javad
    Gharibzadeh, Shahriar
    Fallah, Ali
    Mohammadreza, Amirreza
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2013, 25 (02) : E45 - E45