Detecting European Aspen (Populus tremulaL.) in Boreal Forests Using Airborne Hyperspectral and Airborne Laser Scanning Data

被引:23
作者
Viinikka, Arto [1 ]
Hurskainen, Pekka [1 ,2 ]
Keski-Saari, Sarita [3 ,4 ]
Kivinen, Sonja [1 ,3 ]
Tanhuanpaa, Topi [3 ,5 ]
Mayra, Janne [1 ]
Poikolainen, Laura [3 ]
Vihervaara, Petteri [1 ]
Kumpula, Timo [3 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Latokartanonkaari 11, Helsinki 00790, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, Earth Change Observat Lab, POB 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Geog & Hist Studies, POB 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Environm & Biol Sci, POB 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Dept Forest Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
hyperspectral imaging; airborne laser scanning; machine learning; tree species classification; European aspen; boreal forest; TREE SPECIES CLASSIFICATION; IMAGING SPECTROMETRY DATA; LIDAR DATA; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; LEAF; BIODIVERSITY; CHLOROPHYLL; INVENTORIES; DISCRIMINATION; REFLECTANCE;
D O I
10.3390/rs12162610
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainable forest management increasingly highlights the maintenance of biological diversity and requires up-to-date information on the occurrence and distribution of key ecological features in forest environments. European aspen (Populus tremulaL.) is one key feature in boreal forests contributing significantly to the biological diversity of boreal forest landscapes. However, due to their sparse and scattered occurrence in northern Europe, the explicit spatial data on aspen remain scarce and incomprehensive, which hampers biodiversity management and conservation efforts. Our objective was to study tree-level discrimination of aspen from other common species in northern boreal forests using airborne high-resolution hyperspectral and airborne laser scanning (ALS) data. The study contained multiple spatial analyses: First, we assessed the role of different spectral wavelengths (455-2500 nm), principal component analysis, and vegetation indices (VI) in tree species classification using two machine learning classifiers-support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF). Second, we tested the effect of feature selection for best classification accuracy achievable and third, we identified the most important spectral features to discriminate aspen from the other common tree species. SVM outperformed the RF model, resulting in the highest overall accuracy (OA) of 84% and Kappa value (0.74). The used feature set affected SVM performance little, but for RF, principal component analysis was the best. The most important common VI for deciduous trees contained Conifer Index (CI), Cellulose Absorption Index (CAI), Plant Stress Index 3 (PSI3), and Vogelmann Index 1 (VOG1), whereas Green Ratio (GR), Red Edge Inflection Point (REIP), and Red Well Position (RWP) were specific for aspen. Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE) and Modified Normalized Difference Index (MND705) were important for coniferous trees. The most important wavelengths for discriminating aspen from other species included reflectance bands of red edge range (724-727 nm) and shortwave infrared (1520-1564 nm and 1684-1706 nm). The highest classification accuracy of 92% (F1-score) for aspen was achieved using the SVM model with mean reflectance values combined with VI, which provides a possibility to produce a spatially explicit map of aspen occurrence that can contribute to biodiversity management and conservation efforts in boreal forests.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Agresti A, 1996, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
Ahti T., 1968, Annales Botanici Fennici, V5, P168
[3]   Tree Species Classification Using Hyperspectral Imagery: A Comparison of Two Classifiers [J].
Ballanti, Laurel ;
Blesius, Leonhard ;
Hines, Ellen ;
Kruse, Bill .
REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (06)
[4]   Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions [J].
Belgiu, Mariana ;
Dragut, Lucian .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 114 :24-31
[5]   Be careful with your principal components [J].
Bjorklund, Mats .
EVOLUTION, 2019, 73 (10) :2151-2158
[6]   Quantifying chlorophylls and caroteniods at leaf and canopy scales: An evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches [J].
Blackburn, GA .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 66 (03) :273-285
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   Principal component analysis [J].
Bro, Rasmus ;
Smilde, Age K. .
ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2014, 6 (09) :2812-2831
[9]   Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services [J].
Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. ;
Barbaro, Luc ;
Castagneyrol, Bastien ;
Forrester, David I. ;
Gardiner, Barry ;
Ramon Gonzalez-Olabarria, Jose ;
Lyver, Phil O'B. ;
Meurisse, Nicolas ;
Oxbrough, Anne ;
Taki, Hisatomo ;
Thompson, Ian D. ;
van der Plas, Fons ;
Jactel, Herve .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 26 (13) :3005-3035
[10]   Spectroscopic determination of leaf traits using infrared spectra [J].
Buitrago, Maria F. ;
Groen, Thomas A. ;
Hecker, Christoph A. ;
Skidmore, Andrew K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2018, 69 :237-250