Economic interdependence and third-party international interactions: A 30-country third-party bloc case study

被引:0
作者
Chang, Yuan-Ching [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Culture Univ, Dept Econ, Taipei 111, Taiwan
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1468109907002824
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The trade-conflict model claims that one state, designated 'actor', is deterred from initiating conflict against a trading partner, designated target, for fear of losing the welfare gains associated with trade. This paper extends the trade-conflict model to garner implications concerning trade and conflict interactions where third-party blocs are involved. The theoretical propositions supported by proofs are: (1) if the actor increases trade with a third-party who is a friend of the target, then the actor will decrease conflict toward the target; (2) if the actor increases trade with a third-party who is a rival of the target, then the actor will increase conflict toward the target. A 30-country sample from the Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) is used and divided into three blocs, namely a Western bloc, a Middle Eastern bloc, and an Eastern bloc. The empirical analysis supports the hypotheses. A similar relationship is also discussed and tested for situations in which conflict increases or decreases between the actor and third-party bloc. In addition, the evidence shows that Western bloc countries play a central role in world political and economic relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 87
页数:25
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] AITKEN ND, 1973, AM ECON REV, V63, P881
  • [2] CHOOSING SIDES IN WARS
    ALTFELD, MF
    BUENODEMESQUITA, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 1979, 23 (01) : 87 - 112
  • [3] ANDERSON JE, 1979, AM ECON REV, V69, P106
  • [4] The impact of war on trade: An interrupted times-series study
    Anderton, CH
    Carter, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (04) : 445 - 457
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1982, PEACE BROKERS MEDIAT
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1990, FRIENDS NO ALLIES EC
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1988, NEW APPROACHES INT M
  • [8] [Anonymous], EC INTERDEPENDENCE I
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2001, DEFENCE PEACE EC, DOI DOI 10.1080/10430710108404983
  • [10] AZAR E, 1978, FORECASTING INT RELA