Evaluation of data quality from the Information System on Live Births in 1997-1998

被引:30
作者
da Silva, AAM
Ribeiro, VS
Borba, AF
Coimbra, LC
da Silva, RA
机构
[1] UFMA, Dept Saude Publ, BR-65020070 Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
[2] UFMA, Dept Med 3, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
[3] UFMA, Dept Enfermagem, Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA | 2001年 / 35卷 / 06期
关键词
vital statistics; information systems; birth rates; vital statistics registry; infant; low birth weight; preterm;
D O I
10.1590/S0034-89102001000600003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives To verify the concordance between data routinely collected by, the Sinasc (Information System on Live Births) and data obtained by a cross-sectional survey (gold standard). Methods The survey was performed in a sample of 2,831 hospital deliveries in ten maternity hospitals of the municipality of Sao Luis, Brazil. The sample frame represented about 98% of hospital births. Sinasc's data was compared with the survey data using a computerized linkage program. Sinasc's hospital births coverage, percentage of missing or unrecorded data and consistency between Sinasc's and the survey's data were analyzed. Concordance was measured using the kappa indicator for qualitative variables and the intraclass correlation coefficient for quantitative variables. Results The estimated Sinasc coverage was 75.8% (95% CI: 3.3%-78,2%). Five Sinasc's data fields showed good reliability: birth weight, new born sex, hospital of birth, type or delivery and maternal age. Low birth weight rates estimated by the two data sources were similar and the concordance was high (kappa=0.94). However, preterm birth rates were higher in the survey (11.2%) than according to Sinasc data (1.7%) and the concordance was low (kappa=0.09). Conclusions Estimated Sinasc coverage was low. Low birth weight rates from Sinasc data seem to be valid and reliable. Preterm birth rates from Sinasc's data are underestimated.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 514
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] NOMOGRAMS FOR PRECISE DETERMINATION OF BIRTH-WEIGHT FOR DATES
    ALTMAN, DG
    COLES, EC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 87 (02): : 81 - 86
  • [2] Armitage P., 2001, STAT METHODS MED RES, V4th
  • [3] The use of the 'Linkage' of information systems in cohort studies of neonatal mortality
    deAlmeida, MF
    Jorge, MHPD
    [J]. REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 1996, 30 (02): : 141 - 147
  • [4] DEAN A. G, 1994, EPI INFO VERSION 6
  • [5] Jorge M H, 1993, Rev Saude Publica, V27 Suppl, P1
  • [6] JORGE MHP, 1996, INF EPIDEMIOL SUS, V5, P15
  • [7] THE VALIDITY OF GESTATIONAL-AGE ESTIMATION BY MENSTRUAL DATING IN TERM, PRETERM, AND POSTTERM GESTATIONS
    KRAMER, MS
    MCLEAN, FH
    BOYD, ME
    USHER, RH
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (22): : 3306 - 3308
  • [8] A study of liveborn infants in a municipality of Southeastern Brazil, 1996
    Maia, MAC
    [J]. REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 1997, 31 (06): : 581 - 585
  • [9] Oliveira H, 1997, INF EPIDEMIOL SUS, V6, P15
  • [10] Rodrigues CS, 2002, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V13, P53