Viewing animal bodies: truths, practical aesthetics and ethical considerability in UK livestock breeding

被引:16
作者
Holloway, Lewis [1 ]
Morris, Carol [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hull, Dept Geog Environm & Earth Sci, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
livestock breeding; farming cultures; aesthetics; Foucault; biopower; UK; BIOSOCIAL COLLECTIVITIES; GEOGRAPHY; BIOPOWER; POLITICS; GENETICS; CATTLE; SHOW;
D O I
10.1080/14649365.2013.851264
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the production of aesthetic truths' in UK livestock breeding, drawing on detailed qualitative research with breeders and breed societies. It extends emerging interest in the aesthetic in human geographical research, examining how aesthetic judgements about non-human animals depend, in part, on the agency of the animal and their inter-subjective relations with humans in specific places. Aesthetic evaluation further produces implicit judgements about animals' ethical considerability, at the same time obscuring the effects of such judgements on their framing and treatment. Aesthetic evaluation is thus related to sets of material and ethical interests. The paper develops a more-than-human reading of Foucault's biopower, which explores how truths about visual evaluations of animals become established. Two empirical perspectives explore, first, a relational practical aesthetic' for evaluating beef cattle and sheep, exploring the implications of the aesthetic framing of specific animals and, second, the tensions involved in looking at animals when different aesthetic truths conflict and when traditions of aesthetic evaluation encounter genetic modes of evaluation. The paper concludes by discussing the ethical implications of ongoing transformations of evaluative modes in livestock breeding, suggesting that shifts away from inter-subjective modes of aesthetic evaluation further diminish the ethical status of animals.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   A walk on the wild side: a critical geography of domestication [J].
Anderson, K .
PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 1997, 21 (04) :463-485
[2]   White natures: Sydney's Royal Agricultural Show in post-humanist perspective [J].
Anderson, K .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2003, 28 (04) :422-441
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Postgraduate Journal of Aesthetics, DOI DOI 10.3329/JNAME.V5I2.2615
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, TOURIST GAZE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2002, HYBRID GEOGRAPHIES
[6]   The Aesthetics of Agricultural Landscapes and the Relationship between Humans and Nature . [J].
Brady, Emily .
ETHICS POLICY & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 9 (01) :1-19
[7]  
Derry MargaretElsinor., 2003, Bred for Perfection : Shorthorn Cattle, Collies, and Arabian Horses Since 1800. Animals, History
[8]  
Dixon D., 2012, Dialogues in Human Geography, V2, P249, DOI DOI 10.1177/2043820612468692
[9]   Technological trajectories: old and new dialogues in geography and technology studies [J].
Dixon, Deborah P. ;
Whitehead, Mark .
SOCIAL & CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 9 (06) :601-611
[10]   Creating the semi-living: on politics, aesthetics and the more-than-human [J].
Dixon, Deborah P. .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2009, 34 (04) :411-425