Use of Caval Subtraction 2D Phase-Contrast MR Imaging to Measure Total Liver and Hepatic Arterial Blood Flow: Preclinical Validation and Initial Clinical Translation

被引:9
作者
Chouhan, Manil D. [1 ]
Mookerjee, Rajeshwar P. [2 ]
Bainbridge, Alan [4 ]
Walker-Samuel, Simon [3 ]
Davies, Nathan [2 ]
Halligan, Steve [1 ]
Lythgoe, Mark F. [3 ]
Taylor, Stuart A. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Med Imaging, 250 Euston Rd,3rd Floor East, London NW1 2PG, England
[2] UCL, Inst Liver & Digest Hlth, 250 Euston Rd,3rd Floor East, London NW1 2PG, England
[3] UCL, Ctr Adv Biomed Imaging, Div Med, 250 Euston Rd,3rd Floor East, London NW1 2PG, England
[4] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Med Phys, London, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
BUFFER RESPONSE; REPRODUCIBILITY; HEMODYNAMICS; ULTRASOUND; CIRRHOSIS; ANATOMY; RAT;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2016151832
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To validate caval subtraction two-dimensional (2D) phasecontrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements of total liver blood flow (TLBF) and hepatic arterial fraction in an animal model and evaluate consistency and reproducibility in humans. Materials and Methods: Approval from the institutional ethical committee for animal care and research ethics was obtained. Fifteen Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 2D phase-contrast MR imaging of the portal vein (PV) and infrahepatic and suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). TLBF and hepatic arterial flow were estimated by subtracting infrahepatic from suprahepatic IVC flow and PV flow from estimated TLBF, respectively. Direct PV transittime ultrasonography (US) and fluorescent microsphere measurements of hepatic arterial fraction were the standards of reference. Thereafter, consistency of caval subtraction phasecontrast MR imaging-derived TLBF and hepatic arterial flow was assessed in 13 volunteers (mean age, 28.3 years 6 1.4) against directly measured phase-contrast MR imaging PV and proper hepatic arterial inflow; reproducibility was measured after 7 days. Bland-Altman analysis of agreement and coefficient of variation comparisons were undertaken. Results: There was good agreement between PV flow measured with phase-contrast MR imaging and that measured with transittime US (mean difference, 23.5 mL/min/100 g; 95% limits of agreement [LOA], 661.3 mL/min/100 g). Hepatic arterial fraction obtained with caval subtraction agreed well with those with fluorescent microspheres (mean difference, 4.2%; 95% LOA, 620.5%). Good consistency was demonstrated between TLBF in humans measured with caval subtraction and direct inflow phase-contrast MR imaging (mean difference, 21.3 mL/min/100 g; 95% LOA, 623.1 mL/min/100 g). TLBF reproducibility at 7 days was similar between the two methods (95% LOA, 631.6 mL/min/100 g vs 629.6 mL/min/100 g). Conclusion: Caval subtraction phase-contrast MR imaging is a simple and clinically viable method for measuring TLBF and hepatic arterial flow. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.
引用
收藏
页码:916 / 923
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: Digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients [J].
Covey, AM ;
Brody, LA ;
Maluccio, MA ;
Getrajdman, GI ;
Brown, KT .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) :542-547
[2]   Validation of transit-time ultrasound flow probes to directly measure portal blood flow in conscious rats [J].
DAlmeida, MS ;
Cailmail, S ;
Lebrec, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 271 (06) :H2701-H2709
[3]   Estimator and Tests for Common Coefficients of Variation in Normal Distributions [J].
Forkman, Johannes .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2009, 38 (02) :233-251
[4]   Reproducibility of Quantitative Assessment of Altered Hepatic Hemodynamics With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound [J].
Gauthier, Thomas P. ;
Muhammad, Aun ;
Wasan, Harpreet S. ;
Abel, Paul D. ;
Leen, Edward L. S. .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (09) :1413-1420
[5]   Chronic Liver Disease: Systemic and Splanchnic Venous Flow Mapping with Optimized Cine Phase-Contrast MR Imaging Validated in a Phantom Model and Prospectively Evaluated in Patients [J].
Gouya, Herve ;
Vignaux, Olivier ;
Sogni, Philippe ;
Mallet, Vincent ;
Oudjit, Ammar ;
Pol, Stanislas ;
Legmann, Paul .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) :144-155
[6]  
Haacke EM, 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design
[7]   Increased sensitivity to endotoxemia in the bile duct-ligated cirrhotic rat [J].
Harry, D ;
Anand, R ;
Holt, S ;
Davies, S ;
Marley, R ;
Fernando, B ;
Goodier, D ;
Moore, K .
HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 30 (05) :1198-1205
[8]   SURGICAL ANATOMY OF THE HEPATIC ARTERIES IN 1000 CASES [J].
HIATT, JR ;
GABBAY, J ;
BUSUTTIL, RW .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (01) :50-52
[9]   Hepatic arterial Doppler sonography in patients with cirrhosis and controls:: Observer and equipment variability with use of the ultrasonic contrast agent SHU 508A [J].
Hübner, GH ;
Steudel, N ;
Reissmann, A ;
Kühne, I ;
Kleber, G ;
Schärff, K ;
Fleig, WE .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2005, 43 (07) :639-645
[10]   SINGLE-PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE HEPATIC BLOOD-FLOW AND INTRAHEPATIC SHUNTING [J].
IWASA, M ;
NAKAMURA, K ;
NAKAGAWA, T ;
WATANABE, S ;
KATOH, H ;
KINOSADA, Y ;
MAEDA, H ;
HABARA, J ;
SUZUKI, S .
HEPATOLOGY, 1995, 21 (02) :359-365