Field evaluation of Tomato spotted wilt virus resistance in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

被引:12
|
作者
Yang, H
Ozias-Akins, P
Culbreath, AK
Gorbet, DW
Weeks, JR
Mandal, B
Pappu, HR
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Hort, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Plant Pathol, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
[3] N Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Marianna, FL 32446 USA
[4] Auburn Univ, Wiregrass Expt Stn, Headland, AL 36345 USA
关键词
Bunyaviridae; groundnut; pathogen-derived resistance; plant transformation; Tospovirus;
D O I
10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.3.259
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Spotted wilt, caused by Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV), is a devastating disease of many crops including peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Because the virus has a broad host range and is spread by ubiquitous thrips, disease management by traditional means is difficult. Developing new peanut cultivars with resistance to TSWV presents a significant challenge since existing genetic resistance in peanut germ plasm is limited. A genetic engineering approach appears to have great potential for resistance enhancement to TSWV. Transgenic peanut progenies that expressed the nucleocapsid protein of TSWV were subjected to natural infection of the virus under field conditions during the growing seasons of 1999 and 2000 in Tifton, GA, and in three locations (Tifton, GA, Marianna, FL, and Headland, AL) in 2001. Significantly lower incidence of spotted wilt was observed for the transgenic progeny in comparison to the nontransgenic checks in the field (in multiple years and locations) as well as during challenge inoculation under controlled environmental conditions. This transgenic event could potentially be used in a traditional breeding program to enhance host resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RESISTANCE TO TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS IN LETTUCE
    OMALLEY, PJ
    HARTMANN, RW
    HORTSCIENCE, 1989, 24 (02) : 360 - 362
  • [32] Field response of new peanut cultivar UF 91108 to tomato spotted wilt virus
    Culbreath, AK
    Todd, JW
    Gorbet, DW
    Shokes, FM
    Pappu, HR
    PLANT DISEASE, 1997, 81 (12) : 1410 - 1415
  • [33] PEANUT PLANTS IN QUEENSLAND INFECTED WITH TOMATO SPOTTED WILT VIRUS
    HELMS, K
    PURSS, GS
    GRYLLS, NE
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1961, 12 (02): : 239 - &
  • [34] Cultivar differences in tomato spotted wilt virus tolerance in peanut
    Pereira, MJ
    Pfahler, PL
    Knauft, DA
    Simone, GW
    SOIL AND CROP SCIENCE SOCIETY OF FLORIDA PROCEEDINGS, 1995, 54 : 12 - 16
  • [35] QTL mapping for bacterial wilt resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Zhao, Yongli
    Zhang, Chong
    Chen, Hua
    Yuan, Mei
    Nipper, Rick
    Prakash, C. S.
    Zhuang, Weijian
    He, Guohao
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2016, 36 (02) : 1 - 11
  • [36] QTL mapping for bacterial wilt resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
    Yongli Zhao
    Chong Zhang
    Hua Chen
    Mei Yuan
    Rick Nipper
    C. S. Prakash
    Weijian Zhuang
    Guohao He
    Molecular Breeding, 2016, 36
  • [37] A regression approach for comparing field resistance of peanut cultivars to tomato spotted wilt tospovirus
    Wells, ML
    Culbreath, AK
    Todd, JW
    Brown, SL
    Gorbet, DW
    CROP PROTECTION, 2002, 21 (06) : 467 - 474
  • [38] Refining a major QTL controlling spotted wilt disease resistance in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and evaluating its contribution to the resistance variations in peanut
    Zhao, Zifan
    Tseng, Yu-Chien
    Peng, Ze
    Lopez, Yolanda
    Chen, Charles Y.
    Tillman, Barry L.
    Phat Dang
    Wang, Jianping
    BMC GENETICS, 2018, 19
  • [39] Screening of Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus Resistance in Tomato Accessions
    Han, Jung-Heon
    Choi, Hak-Soon
    Lee, Jundae
    Kim, Jae-Deok
    Lee, Won Phil
    Choi, Hong-Soo
    Kim, Jung-Soo
    Yoon, Jae Bok
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 171 - 177
  • [40] Pathogenesis of tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut plants dually infected with peanut mottle virus
    Hoffmann, K
    Geske, SM
    Moyer, JW
    PLANT DISEASE, 1998, 82 (06) : 610 - 614