A risk stratification model for predicting brain metastasis and brain screening benefit in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

被引:12
作者
Lin, Mingxi [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Yizi [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Biyun [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xichun [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, 270 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Brain metastasis; Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer; Nomogram; Overall survival; Prognosis; THERAPY; NOMOGRAM; OUTCOMES; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.3449
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) frequently experience brain metastasis. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors and construct a nomogram for predicting brain metastasis possibility and brain screening benefit in mTNBC patients. Methods Patients with mTNBC treated at our institution between January 2011 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Fine and Gray's competing risks model was used to identify independent prognostic factors. By integrating these prognostic factors, a competing risk nomogram and risk stratification model were developed and evaluated with concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. Results A total of 472 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 305 patients in the training set, 78 patients in the validation set I and 89 patients in the validation set II. Four clinicopathological factors were identified as independent prognostic factors in the nomogram: lung metastasis, number of metastatic organ sites, hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis and KI-67 index. The C-indexes and calibration plots showed that the nomogram exhibited a sufficient level of discrimination. A risk stratification was further generated to divide all the patients into three prognostic groups. The cumulative incidence of brain metastasis at 18 months was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-9.7%) for patients in the low-risk group, while 14.3% (95% CI, 9.3%-20.4%) for patients with intermediate risk and 34.3% (95% CI, 26.8%-41.9%) for patients with high risk. Routine brain MRI screening improved overall survival in high-risk group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.98,P = .039), but not in low-risk group (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.57-1.49,P = .751) and intermediate-risk group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.27,P = .386). Conclusions We have developed a robust tool that is able to predict subsequent brain metastasis in mTNBC patients. Our model will allow selection of patients at high risk for brain metastasis who might benefit from routine bran MRI screening.
引用
收藏
页码:8540 / 8551
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   How to Make Anticancer Drugs Cross the Blood-Brain Barrier to Treat Brain Metastases [J].
Angeli, Eurydice ;
Nguyen, Thuy T. ;
Janin, Anne ;
Bousquet, Guilhem .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (01)
[2]   Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Aoyama, Hidefumi ;
Shirato, Hiroki ;
Tago, Masao ;
Nakagawa, Keiichi ;
Toyoda, Tatsuya ;
Hatano, Kazuo ;
Kenjyo, Masahiro ;
Oya, Natsuo ;
Hirota, Saeko ;
Shioura, Hiroki ;
Kunieda, Etsuo ;
Inomata, Taisuke ;
Hayakawa, Kazushige ;
Katoh, Norio ;
Kobashi, Gen .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (21) :2483-2491
[3]   Clinical importance and therapeutic implications of the pivotal CXCL12-CXCR4 (chemokine ligand-receptor) interaction in cancer cell migration [J].
Arya, Manit ;
Ahmed, Hashim ;
Silhi, Nitika ;
Williamson, Magali ;
Patel, Hiten R. H. .
TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2007, 28 (03) :123-131
[4]   Predicting Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients: Stage Versus Biology [J].
Azim, Hamdy A. ;
Abdel-Malek, Raafat ;
Kassem, Loay .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (02) :E187-E195
[5]   Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Brown, Paul D. ;
Jaeckle, Kurt ;
Ballman, Karla V. ;
Farace, Elana ;
Cerhan, Jane H. ;
Anderson, S. Keith ;
Carrero, Xiomara W. ;
Barker, Fred G., II ;
Deming, Richard ;
Burri, Stuart H. ;
Menard, Cynthia ;
Chung, Caroline ;
Stieber, Volker W. ;
Pollock, Bruce E. ;
Galanis, Evanthia ;
Buckner, Jan C. ;
Asher, Anthony L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (04) :401-409
[6]   Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: Decade report (2005-2015) [J].
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Spence, Danielle ;
Mertz, Shirley ;
Corneliussen-James, Dian ;
Sabelko, Kimberly ;
Gralow, Julie ;
Cardoso, Maria-Joao ;
Peccatori, Fedro ;
Paonessa, Diego ;
Benares, Ann ;
Sakurai, Naomi ;
Beishon, Marc ;
Barker, Sarah-Jane ;
Mayer, Musa .
BREAST, 2018, 39 :131-138
[7]   Identifying risk factors for brain metastasis in breast cancer patients: Implication for a vigorous surveillance program [J].
Chow, Lorraine ;
Suen, Dacita ;
Ma, Kwok Kuen ;
Kwong, Ava .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 38 (04) :220-223
[8]   Nano-machining of materials: understanding the process through molecular dynamics simulation [J].
Cui, Dan-Dan ;
Zhang, Liang-Chi .
ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING, 2017, 5 (01) :20-34
[9]   Biological subtypes and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases in the targeted therapy era [J].
de Almeida Bastos, Dhiego Chaves ;
Calfat Maldaun, Marcos Vinicius ;
Sawaya, Raymond ;
Suki, Dima ;
Lang, Frederick F. ;
Brown, Paul D. ;
Rao, Ganesh ;
Weinberg, Jeffrey S. ;
Prabhu, Sujit S. .
NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2018, 5 (03) :161-169
[10]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509