Evaluating the influence of 6MV and 10MV photon beams on cervical cancer volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans

被引:2
作者
He, Dong-Cheng [1 ]
Zhu, Zhi-Jian [1 ]
Zhang, Xiao-Ye [1 ]
Zhang, Yan [1 ]
Hong, Jun [1 ]
Shi, Ting-Ting [1 ]
Han, Ji-Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Affiliated Huaian Peoples Hosp 1, 1 Huanghe Rd West, Huaian City 223300, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy; cervical cancer; transverse diameter; 6; MV; 10; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; RISK; WEIGHT; STATISTICS; ENERGIES; NUMBER; INDEX;
D O I
10.3233/THC-213617
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is a common gynecological cancer among women worldwide. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of 6 MV and 10 MV volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon beams on the target volume (TV) planning and critical organs in cases of cervical cancer. METHODS: Fifty patients with carcinoma of the cervix who underwent radiotherapy were selected. The transverse diameter (T) of the cross section of the upper edge of the sacroiliac joint on computerized tomography (CT) images of the patients was measured, and the mean value was calculated as 34 cm. All patients were divided into two groups: Group A (T < 34 cm) and Group B (T > 34 cm). The VMAT plans were generated using 6 MV and 10 MV plans separately. The prescription dose was 47.5 Gy, and the daily dose was 1.9 Gy. RESULTS: In Group A, the planning target volume (PTV) dose assessment parameters of 6 MV and 10 MV plans and their homogeneity and conformity indices were not statistically significantly different. A significant difference was observed between the 6 MV and 10 MV plans for the PTV dose assessment parameters and the homogeneity index of the plans for Group B. The monitor units (MUs) of the 10 MV plans were lower than in the 6 MV plans in both Groups A and B, and the difference was statistically significant. The assessment parameter V-40 Gy of both the rectum and bladder in the 6 MV plans was smaller than the corresponding parameter in the 10 MV plans in Group A; in Group B, the assessment parameter V-50 Gy of the rectum in the 10 MV plans was smaller than in the 6 MV plans. CONCLUSION: When T < 34 cm, 6 MV energy is more suitable for the external irradiation of cervical cancer. When T > 34 cm, 10 MV energy is more suitable for cervical cancer radiotherapy. Therefore, 10 MV should be considered for patients with a large abdominal size.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1523
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Measurements, 2010, 83 COMM RAD UN MEAS
  • [2] A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy
    Cozzi, Luca
    Dinshaw, Ketayun Ardeshir
    Shrivastava, Shyam Kishore
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Engineer, Reena
    Deshpande, Deepak Dattatray
    Jamema, S. V.
    Vanetti, Eugenio
    Clivio, Alessandro
    Nicolini, Giorgia
    Fogliata, Antonella
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (02) : 180 - 191
  • [3] Nontumor integral dose variation in conventional radiotherapy treatment planning
    D'Souza, WD
    Rosen, II
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) : 2065 - 2071
  • [4] ASSESSING THE ROLE OF VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY (VMAT) RELATIVE TO IMRT AND HELICAL TOMOTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LOCALIZED, LOCALLY ADVANCED, AND POST-OPERATIVE PROSTATE CANCER
    Davidson, Melanie T. M.
    Blake, Samuel J.
    Batchelar, Deidre L.
    Cheung, Patrick
    Mah, Katherine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (05): : 1550 - 1558
  • [5] Conformity index:: A review
    Feuvret, L
    Noël, G
    Mazeron, JJ
    Bey, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (02): : 333 - 342
  • [6] Volumetric modulated arc therapy is superior to conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy - a comparison among prostate cancer patients treated in an Australian centre
    Fogarty, Gerald B.
    Ng, Diana
    Liu, Guilin
    Haydu, Lauren E.
    Bhandari, Nastik
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6
  • [7] IMRT should not be administered at photon energies greater than 10 MV
    Followill, David S.
    Nuesslin, Fridtjof
    Orton, Colin G.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 1877 - 1879
  • [8] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons, and the risk of second cancers
    Hall, Eric J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 65 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [9] The ICRU Report 83: Regulation, Documentation and Communication in the fluence of Modulated Photon radiotherapy (MRT)
    Hodapp, N.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2012, 188 (01) : 97 - 99
  • [10] Jemal A, 2010, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V60, P277, DOI [10.3322/caac.21254, 10.3322/caac.20073]