Potential Impacts of Net-Zero Energy Buildings With Distributed Photovoltaic Power Generation on the US Electrical Grid

被引:12
|
作者
Kim, Dongsu [1 ]
Cho, Heejin [1 ]
Luck, Rogelio [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, POB 9552, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2019年 / 141卷 / 06期
关键词
net-zero energy building; US electrical grid; US climate zones; grid-tied photovoltaic generation; electrical energy storage; DESIGN; PV;
D O I
10.1115/1.4042407
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the potential aggregate effects of net-zero energy building (NZEB) implementations on the electrical grid in a simulation-based analysis. To estimate the impact of NZEBs on the electrical grid, a simulation-based study of an office building with a grid-tied photovoltaic (PV) power generation system is conducted. This study assumes that net-metering is available for NZEBs such that the excess on-site PV generation can be fed to the electrical grid. The impact of electrical energy storage (EES) within NZEBs on the electrical grid is also considered in this study. Different levels of NZEB adoption are examined: 20%, 50%, and 100% of the U. S. office building stock. Results indicate that significant penetration of NZEBs could potentially affect the current U. S. electricity demand profiles by reducing purchased electricity from the electrical grid and by increasing exported electricity to the electrical grid during peak hours. Annual electricity consumption of simulated office NZEBs in the U. S. climate locations is in the range of around 94-132 kWh/m(2) yr. Comparison of hourly electricity demand profiles for the actual U. S. demand versus the calculated net-demand on a national scales indicates that the peak percentage difference of the U.S. net-electricity demand includes about 10.7%, 15.2%, and 9.3% for 100% of the U.S. NZEB stock on representative summer, transition, and winter days, respectively. Using EES within NZEBs, the peak percentage differences are reduced and shifted to the afternoon, including 8.6%, 13.3%, and 6.3% for 100% of the U. S. NZEB stock on each representative day.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Net-zero nation: HVAC and PV systems for residential net-zero energy buildings across the United States
    Wu, Wei
    Skye, Harrison M.
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 177 : 605 - 628
  • [22] Real world energy and carbon costs of net-zero energy buildings
    Miranda L. Vinay
    Communications Engineering, 1 (1):
  • [23] Integration of passive PCM technologies for net-zero energy buildings
    Stritih, U.
    Tyagi, V. V.
    Stropnik, R.
    Paksoy, H.
    Haghighat, F.
    Joybari, M. Mastani
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 41 : 286 - 295
  • [24] Intermediating policy for transitions towards net-zero energy buildings
    Kivimaa, Paula
    Primmer, Eeva
    Lukkarinen, Jani
    ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 36 : 418 - 432
  • [25] MAIN STREET NET-ZERO ENERGY BUILDINGS: THE ZERO ENERGY METHOD IN CONCEPT AND PRACTICE
    Torcellini, Paul
    Pless, Shanti
    Lobato, Chad
    Hootman, Tom
    ES2010: PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 1, 2010, : 1009 - 1017
  • [26] Challenges to Statewide Net-Zero Energy Buildings: The Oregon Experience
    Heizer, Mark
    Shelide, Blake
    ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2020, VOL 126, 2020, 126 : 29 - 37
  • [27] Net-zero buildings: when carbon and energy metrics diverge
    Parkin, Anna
    Herrera, Manuel
    Coley, David A.
    BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 86 - 99
  • [28] Special Issue "Net-Zero/Positive Energy Buildings and Districts"
    Hasan, Ala
    Reda, Francesco
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (03)
  • [29] Designing net-zero energy buildings for the future climate, not for the past
    Robert, Amelie
    Kummert, Michael
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 55 : 150 - 158
  • [30] Regenerative Design of Existing Buildings for Net-Zero Energy Use
    Aksamija, Ajla
    DEFINING THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE IN DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 118 : 72 - 80