Worked examples with errors: when self-explanation prompts hinder learning of teachers diagnostic competences on problem-based learning

被引:16
作者
Heitzmann, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Fischer, Frank [1 ]
Fischer, Martin R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, Leopoldstr 13, D-80802 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Inst Med Educ, Pettenkoferstr 8a, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
Diagnostic competences; Worked examples with errors; Self-explanation prompts; Adaptable feedback; Teacher education; STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS; INSTRUCTIONAL-DESIGN; SKILLS; PERFORMANCE; ENGAGEMENT; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK; GUIDANCE; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11251-017-9432-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To diagnose classroom situations is crucial for teachers' everyday practice. The approach of worked examples with errors seems promising to support the diagnosis of classroom situations in student teachers (Stark et al. in Learn Instr 21(1):22-33, 2011). To enhance that approach, error-explanation prompts and an adaptable feedback method to help the learner realize why an error happened and how to prevent a recurrence might be beneficial. In this empirical study, we investigated whether error-explanation prompts and adaptable feedback can facilitate diagnostic competences. N = 108 student teachers took part in a 2 x 2 factorial design (with and without error-explanation prompts as well as with and without adaptable feedback). Error-explanation prompts had a positive effect on declarative-conceptual knowledge if combined with adaptable feedback. Student teachers might have realized a lack of basic concepts and focused their attention on the declarative-conceptual knowledge in the feedback. Contrary to our expectations, however, error-explanation prompts hindered rather than facilitated learning of practical diagnostic knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 271
页数:27
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]   Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities [J].
Chi, Michelene T. H. .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2009, 1 (01) :73-105
[12]   SELF-EXPLANATIONS - HOW STUDENTS STUDY AND USE EXAMPLES IN LEARNING TO SOLVE PROBLEMS [J].
CHI, MTH ;
BASSOK, M ;
LEWIS, MW ;
REIMANN, P ;
GLASER, R .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 1989, 13 (02) :145-182
[13]  
CICCHETTI DV, 1981, AM J MENT DEF, V86, P127
[14]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI [10.4324/9780203771587, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587]
[15]  
Curry LA, 2004, PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SIXTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, P1548
[16]   Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought [J].
de Jong, Ton .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2010, 38 (02) :105-134
[17]   The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude [J].
Durkin, Kelley ;
Rittle-Johnson, Bethany .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2012, 22 (03) :206-214
[18]   Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains [J].
Ericsson, KA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2004, 79 (10) :S70-S81
[19]   A practical guide to assessing clinical decision-making skills using the key features approach [J].
Farmer, EA ;
Page, G .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (12) :1188-1194
[20]   Virtual Patients in Medical Education: A Comparison of Various Strategies for Curricular Integration [J].
Fischer, Martin R. ;
Hege, Inga ;
Hoernlein, Alexander ;
Puppe, Frank ;
Toenshoff, Burkhard ;
Huwendiek, Soeren .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2008, 102 (10) :648-653