Identification of potential biomarkers related to glioma survival by gene expression profile analysis

被引:49
作者
Hsu, Justin Bo-Kai [1 ]
Chang, Tzu-Hao [2 ]
Lee, Gilbert Aaron [1 ]
Lee, Tzong-Yi [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chen, Cheng-Yu [6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Grad Inst Biomed Informat, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Warshel Inst Computat Biol, Shenzhen 518172, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Sci & Engn, Shenzhen 518172, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Shenzhen 518172, Peoples R China
[6] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Res Ctr Translat Imaging, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[7] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[8] Taipei Med Univ, Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[9] Taipei Med Univ, Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Imaging Res Ctr, Taipei 110, Taiwan
[10] Triserv Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 114, Taiwan
[11] Natl Def Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Taipei 114, Taiwan
关键词
Low-grade glioma (LGG); High-grade glioma; Gene signature; Biomarkers; Prognosis; HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA; MALIGNANT GLIOMAS; SIGNALING PATHWAY; CO-DELETION; GLIOBLASTOMA; SIGNATURE; PROGNOSIS; PREDICT; TUMORS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12920-019-0479-6
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
BackgroundRecent studies have proposed several gene signatures as biomarkers for different grades of gliomas from various perspectives. However, most of these genes can only be used appropriately for patients with specific grades of gliomas.MethodsIn this study, we aimed to identify survival-relevant genes shared between glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and lower-grade glioma (LGG), which could be used as potential biomarkers to classify patients into different risk groups. Cox proportional hazard regression model (Cox model) was used to extract relative genes, and effectiveness of genes was estimated against random forest regression. Finally, risk models were constructed with logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 104 key genes that were shared between GBM and LGG, which could be significantly correlated with patients' survival based on next-generation sequencing data obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas for gene expression analysis. The effectiveness of these genes in the survival prediction of GBM and LGG was evaluated, and the average receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under the curve values ranged from 0.7 to 0.8. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed that these genes were involved in eight significant pathways and 23 molecular functions. Moreover, the expressions of ten (CTSZ, EFEMP2, ITGA5, KDELR2, MDK, MICALL2, MAP2K3, PLAUR, SERPINE1, and SOCS3) of these genes were significantly higher in GBM than in LGG, and comparing their expression levels to those of the proposed control genes (TBP, IPO8, and SDHA) could have the potential capability to classify patients into high- and low- risk groups, which differ significantly in the overall survival. Signatures of candidate genes were validated, by multiple microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus, to increase the robustness of using these potential prognostic factors. In both the GBM and LGG cohort study, most of the patients in the high-risk group had the IDH1 wild-type gene, and those in the low-risk group had IDH1 mutations. Moreover, most of the high-risk patients with LGG possessed a 1p/19q-noncodeletion.ConclusionIn this study, we identified survival relevant genes which were shared between GBM and LGG, and those enabled to classify patients into high- and low-risk groups based on expression level analysis. Both the risk groups could be correlated with the well-known genetic variants, thus suggesting their potential prognostic value in clinical application.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Afra D, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1011
[2]   The RNA-binding zinc-finger protein tristetraprolin regulates AU-rich mRNAs involved in breast cancer-related processes [J].
Al-Souhibani, N. ;
Al-Ahmadi, W. ;
Hesketh, J. E. ;
Blackshear, P. J. ;
Khabar, K. S. A. .
ONCOGENE, 2010, 29 (29) :4205-4215
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, RAND FOR SURV REGR C
[4]   Pretreatment factors predict overall survival for patients with low-grade glioma: A recursive partitioning analysis [J].
Bauman, G ;
Lote, K ;
Larson, D ;
Stalpers, L ;
Leighton, C ;
Fisher, B ;
Wara, W ;
MacDonald, D ;
Stitt, L ;
Cairncross, JG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (04) :923-929
[5]   GeneAnalytics: An Integrative Gene Set Analysis Tool for Next Generation Sequencing, RNAseq and Microarray Data [J].
Ben-Ari Fuchs, Shani ;
Lieder, Iris ;
Stelzer, Gil ;
Mazor, Yaron ;
Buzhor, Ella ;
Kaplan, Sergey ;
Bogoch, Yoel ;
Plaschkes, Inbar ;
Shitrit, Alina ;
Rappaport, Noa ;
Kohn, Asher ;
Edgar, Ron ;
Shenhav, Liraz ;
Safran, Marilyn ;
Lancet, Doron ;
Guan-Golan, Yaron ;
Warshawsky, David ;
Shtrichman, Ronit .
OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 20 (03) :139-151
[6]   Integrins in the Spotlight of Cancer [J].
Bianconi, Daniela ;
Unseld, Matthias ;
Prager, Gerald W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2016, 17 (12)
[7]   The Accuracy of Survival Time Prediction for Patients with Glioma Is Improved by Measuring Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Gene Expression [J].
Bie, Li ;
Zhao, Gang ;
Cheng, Pui ;
Rondeau, Gaelle ;
Porwollik, Steffen ;
Ju, Yan ;
Xia, Xiao-Qin ;
McClelland, Michael .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (10)
[8]   A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias [J].
Bolstad, BM ;
Irizarry, RA ;
Åstrand, M ;
Speed, TP .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (02) :185-193
[9]   Bayesian ensemble methods for survival prediction in gene expression data [J].
Bonato, Vinicius ;
Baladandayuthapani, Veerabhadran ;
Broom, Bradley M. ;
Sulman, Erik P. ;
Aldape, Kenneth D. ;
Do, Kim-Anh .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (03) :359-367
[10]   Molecular Profiling Reveals Biologically Discrete Subsets and Pathways of Progression in Diffuse Glioma [J].
Ceccarelli, Michele ;
Barthel, Floris P. ;
Malta, Tathiane M. ;
Sabedot, Thais S. ;
Salama, Sofie R. ;
Murray, Bradley A. ;
Morozova, Olena ;
Newton, Yulia ;
Radenbaugh, Amie ;
Pagnotta, Stefano M. ;
Anjum, Samreen ;
Wang, Jiguang ;
Manyam, Ganiraju ;
Zoppoli, Pietro ;
Ling, Shiyun ;
Rao, Arjun A. ;
Grifford, Mia ;
Cherniack, Andrew D. ;
Zhang, Hailei ;
Poisson, Laila ;
Carlotti, Carlos Gilberto, Jr. ;
Tirapelli, Daniela Pretti da Cunha ;
Rao, Arvind ;
Mikkelsen, Tom ;
Lau, Ching C. ;
Yung, W. K. Alfred ;
Rabadan, Raul ;
Huse, Jason ;
Brat, Daniel J. ;
Lehman, Norman L. ;
Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S. ;
Zheng, Siyuan ;
Hess, Kenneth ;
Rao, Ganesh ;
Meyerson, Matthew ;
Beroukhim, Rameen ;
Cooper, Lee ;
Akbani, Rehan ;
Wrensch, Margaret ;
Haussler, David ;
Aldape, Kenneth D. ;
Laird, Peter W. ;
Gutmann, David H. ;
Noushmehr, Houtan ;
Iavarone, Antonio ;
Verhaak, Roel G. W. .
CELL, 2016, 164 (03) :550-563