Nomogram Predicting Adverse Pathology Outcome on Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Men

被引:9
|
作者
Nasri, Jordan [1 ]
Barthe, Flora
Parekh, Sneha
Ratnani, Parita
Pedraza, Adriana M.
Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Olivier, Jonathan
Villers, Arnauld
Tewari, Ash
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ACTIVE-SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; VALIDATION; INTERMEDIATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model to predict the risk of adverse pathology outcome on final pathology in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) men. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a monocentric retrospective analysis of 426 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for low-risk PCa. The validation cohort included 103 men from another hospital. Adverse pathology outcome was defined either by upgrading on RP Gleason Score (GS) (from GS 3+3 to GS >= 3+4 with Gleason pattern 4 >= 10%) or a non-organ confined disease (pathologic stage >= pT3a). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build nomogram for predicting adverse pathology outcome. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the external cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate and compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates between the two groups. RESULTS Of 426 men in the development cohort, 45.7% showed adverse pathology outcome on RP. Age, body mass index, prostate specific antigen density, history of prior negative biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging prostate imaging reporting and data system score 4-5 and percentage of positive biopsies were significant predictors in multivariate analysis. A nomogram was constructed with an area under curve of 87%. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the validation cohort. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in patients with and without adverse pathology outcome was 70% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION This novel nomogram would help identify low-risk PCa men at risk of adverse pathology outcome and can be relevant for treatment decision-making. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prospective quality-of-life outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer: Active surveillance versus radical prostatectomy
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Cullen, Jennifer
    Hurwitz, Lauren M.
    Wolff, Erika M.
    Levie, Katherine E.
    Odem-Davis, Katherine
    Johnston, Richard B.
    Pham, Khanh N.
    Rosner, Inger L.
    Brand, Timothy C.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Sterbis, Joseph R.
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Porter, Christopher R.
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (14) : 2465 - 2473
  • [32] The Role of Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the Prediction of Adverse Prostate Cancer Pathology in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen
    Riedel, Andreas
    Michael, Marlene
    Gruenberg, Jenny
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Boeehm, Katharina
    Hachtel, Jakob
    Platzek, Ivan
    Sommer, Ulrich
    Baunacke, Martin
    Thomas, Christian
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2024, 108 (02) : 146 - 152
  • [33] Prostate Health Index (phi) and its derivatives predict Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer
    Yan, Jia-Qi
    Huang, Da
    Huang, Jing-Yi
    Ruan, Xiao-Hao
    Lin, Xiao-Ling
    Fang, Zu-Jun
    Gao, Yi
    Jiang, Hao-Wen
    Wu, Yi-Shuo
    Na, Rong
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) : 406 - +
  • [34] External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Prostate Cancer Gleason Sum Upgrading Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology Among Japanese Patients
    Imamoto, Takashi
    Suzuki, Hiroyoshi
    Utsumi, Takanobu
    Takano, Makoto
    Suyama, Takahito
    Kawamura, Koji
    Kamiya, Naoto
    Naya, Yukio
    Ueda, Takeshi
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    UROLOGY, 2010, 76 (02) : 404 - 410
  • [35] Adverse upgrading and/or upstaging in contemporary low-risk prostate cancer patients
    Flammia, Rocco S.
    Hoeh, Benedikt
    Hohenhorst, Lukas
    Sorce, Gabriele
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Panunzio, Andrea
    Tian, Zhe
    Saad, Fred
    Leonardo, Costantino
    Briganti, Alberto
    Antonelli, Alessandro
    Terrone, Carlo
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Graefen, Markus
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Gallucci, Michele
    Karakiewicz, Pierre, I
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 54 (10) : 2521 - 2528
  • [36] A magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy
    Castellani, Daniele
    Cecchini, Sara
    Mazzucchelli, Roberta
    Soraci, Luca
    Di Rosa, Mirko
    Fabbietti, Paolo
    Palagonia, Erika
    Puccio, Francesca
    Carnevali, Francesca
    Paci, Enrico
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (08) : 379.e1 - 379.e8
  • [37] Predicting recurrence after radical prostatectomy for patients with high risk prostate cancer
    Grossfeld, GD
    Latini, DM
    Lubeck, DP
    Mehta, SS
    Carroll, PR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (01) : 157 - 163
  • [38] Pathological Outcome in Men with Prostate Cancer Suitable for Active Surveillance After Radical Prostatectomy
    Tan, Grace
    Ho, Henry
    Huang, Hong Hong
    Cheng, Christopher Wai Sam
    Lau, Weber Kam On
    PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2012, 21 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [39] A new predictor is comparable to the updated nomogram in predicting the intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer but outperforms nomogram in reducing the overtreatment for the low-risk Pca
    Wang, Hui
    Tai, Sheng
    Zhang, Li
    Zhou, Jun
    Liang, Chaozhao
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 3753 - 3763
  • [40] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 225 - 230