Nomogram Predicting Adverse Pathology Outcome on Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Men

被引:9
|
作者
Nasri, Jordan [1 ]
Barthe, Flora
Parekh, Sneha
Ratnani, Parita
Pedraza, Adriana M.
Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Olivier, Jonathan
Villers, Arnauld
Tewari, Ash
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ACTIVE-SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; VALIDATION; INTERMEDIATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model to predict the risk of adverse pathology outcome on final pathology in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) men. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a monocentric retrospective analysis of 426 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for low-risk PCa. The validation cohort included 103 men from another hospital. Adverse pathology outcome was defined either by upgrading on RP Gleason Score (GS) (from GS 3+3 to GS >= 3+4 with Gleason pattern 4 >= 10%) or a non-organ confined disease (pathologic stage >= pT3a). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build nomogram for predicting adverse pathology outcome. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the external cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate and compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates between the two groups. RESULTS Of 426 men in the development cohort, 45.7% showed adverse pathology outcome on RP. Age, body mass index, prostate specific antigen density, history of prior negative biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging prostate imaging reporting and data system score 4-5 and percentage of positive biopsies were significant predictors in multivariate analysis. A nomogram was constructed with an area under curve of 87%. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the validation cohort. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in patients with and without adverse pathology outcome was 70% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION This novel nomogram would help identify low-risk PCa men at risk of adverse pathology outcome and can be relevant for treatment decision-making. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D'Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Tian, Zhe
    Schiffmann, Jonas
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Francesco, Montorsi
    Alberto, Briganti
    Heinzer, Hans
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Budaeus, Lars
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 189 - 197
  • [22] Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology
    Chun, FKH
    Steuber, T
    Erbersdobler, A
    Currlin, E
    Walz, J
    Schlomm, T
    Haese, A
    Heinzer, H
    McCormack, M
    Huland, H
    Graefen, M
    Karakiewicz, PI
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) : 820 - 826
  • [23] A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D’Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients
    Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
    Paolo Dell’Oglio
    Zhe Tian
    Jonas Schiffmann
    Shahrokh F. Shariat
    Nazareno Suardi
    Montorsi Francesco
    Briganti Alberto
    Hans Heinzer
    Hartwig Huland
    Markus Graefen
    Lars Budäus
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 189 - 197
  • [24] Psychological distress and lifestyle disruption in low-risk prostate cancer patients: Comparison between active surveillance and radical prostatectomy
    Matthew, Andrew G.
    Raz, Orit
    Currie, Kristen L.
    Louis, Alyssa S.
    Jiang, Haiyan
    Davidson, Tal
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Trachtenberg, John
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (02) : 159 - 174
  • [25] Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in National Comprehensive Cancer Network High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy
    Wenzel, Mike
    Wuernschimmel, Christoph
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Flammia, Rocco Simone
    Tian, Zhe
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Gallucci, Michele
    Terrone, Carlo
    Saad, Fred
    Tilki, Derya
    Graefen, Markus
    Becker, Andreas
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Mandel, Philipp
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1133 - 1140
  • [26] Should men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer choose active surveillance or undergo a robotic prostatectomy?
    Peter Albertsen
    Current Urology Reports, 2008, 9 (1) : 1 - 2
  • [27] Prostate Volume is A Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zou, Qianming
    Cao, Jiadong
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Shusheng
    Gu, Chiming
    Li, Siyi
    Xiang, Songtao
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [28] Intensity of Active Surveillance and Transition to Treatment in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer
    Olsson, Henrik
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Clements, Mark
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Lantz, Anna Wallerstedt
    Eklund, Martin
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 640 - 647
  • [29] Cell cycle progression score improves risk stratification in prostate cancer patients with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy
    Xun, Shangguan
    Qian, Hongyang
    Jiang, Zhou
    Xin, Zhixiang
    Pan, Jiahua
    Dong, Baijun
    Xue, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (03) : 687 - 694
  • [30] Intermediate Grade Prostate Cancer and Risk for Adverse Pathology Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Partial Gland Ablation Case Selection
    Stangl-Kremser, Judith
    Patel, Neal
    Hu, Jim C.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2023, 21 (04) : 491 - 496