Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application

被引:170
作者
Scheben, Armin
Batley, Jacqueline
Edwards, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Plant Biol, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Breeding; Genomics; genotyping-by-sequencing; reduced-representation sequencing; whole-genome resequencing; MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; HYBRID ERROR-CORRECTION; WIDE ASSOCIATION; DE-NOVO; LINKAGE MAP; NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; AGRONOMIC TRAITS; COMPLEX TRAITS; EXOME CAPTURE; RNA-SEQ;
D O I
10.1111/pbi.12645
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In the last decade, the revolution in sequencing technologies has deeply impacted crop genotyping practice. New methods allowing rapid, high-throughput genotyping of entire crop populations have proliferated and opened the door to wider use of molecular tools in plant breeding. These new genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) methods include over a dozen reduced-representation sequencing (RRS) approaches and at least four whole-genome resequencing (WGR) approaches. The diversity of methods available, each often producing different types of data at different cost, can make selection of the best-suited method seem a daunting task. We review the most common genotyping methods used today and compare their suitability for linkage mapping, genomewide association studies (GWAS), marker-assisted and genomic selection and genome assembly and improvement in crops with various genome sizes and complexity. Furthermore, we give an outline of bioinformatics tools for analysis of genotyping data. WGR is well suited to genotyping biparental cross populations with complex, small- to moderate-sized genomes and provides the lowest cost per marker data point. RRS approaches differ in their suitability for various tasks, but demonstrate similar costs per marker data point. These approaches are generally better suited for de novo applications and more cost-effective when genotyping populations with large genomes or high heterozygosity. We expect that although RRS approaches will remain the most cost-effective for some time, WGR will become more widespread for crop genotyping as sequencing costs continue to decrease.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:13
相关论文
共 165 条
  • [1] Genome sequencing reveals agronomically important loci in rice using MutMap
    Abe, Akira
    Kosugi, Shunichi
    Yoshida, Kentaro
    Natsume, Satoshi
    Takagi, Hiroki
    Kanzaki, Hiroyuki
    Matsumura, Hideo
    Yoshida, Kakoto
    Mitsuoka, Chikako
    Tamiru, Muluneh
    Innan, Hideki
    Cano, Liliana
    Kamoun, Sophien
    Terauchi, Ryohei
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 174 - 178
  • [2] Akhunov E., 2016, PLANT AN GEN 24 C SA
  • [3] Annotating non-coding regions of the genome
    Alexander, Roger P.
    Fang, Gang
    Rozowsky, Joel
    Snyder, Michael
    Gerstein, Mark B.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2010, 11 (08) : 559 - 571
  • [4] RAD Capture (Rapture): Flexible and Efficient Sequence-Based Genotyping
    Ali, Omar A.
    O'Rourke, Sean M.
    Amish, Stephen J.
    Meek, Mariah H.
    Luikart, Gordon
    Jeffres, Carson
    Miller, Michael R.
    [J]. GENETICS, 2016, 202 (02) : 389 - +
  • [5] Discovery and development of exome-based, co-dominant single nucleotide polymorphism markers in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
    Allen, Alexandra M.
    Barker, Gary L. A.
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Burridge, Amanda
    Winfield, Mark
    Coghill, Jane
    Uauy, Cristobal
    Griffiths, Simon
    Jack, Peter
    Berry, Simon
    Werner, Peter
    Melichar, James P. E.
    McDougall, Jane
    Gwilliam, Rhian
    Robinson, Phil
    Edwards, Keith J.
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 11 (03) : 279 - 295
  • [6] Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping
    Andolfatto, Peter
    Davison, Dan
    Erezyilmaz, Deniz
    Hu, Tina T.
    Mast, Joshua
    Sunayama-Morita, Tomoko
    Stern, David L.
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2011, 21 (04) : 610 - 617
  • [7] Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics
    Andrews, Kimberly R.
    Good, Jeffrey M.
    Miller, Michael R.
    Luikart, Gordon
    Hohenlohe, Paul A.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2016, 17 (02) : 81 - 92
  • [8] GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis
    Aulchenko, Yurii S.
    Ripke, Stephan
    Isaacs, Aaron
    Van Duijn, Cornelia M.
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 23 (10) : 1294 - 1296
  • [9] Rapid SNP Discovery and Genetic Mapping Using Sequenced RAD Markers
    Baird, Nathan A.
    Etter, Paul D.
    Atwood, Tressa S.
    Currey, Mark C.
    Shiver, Anthony L.
    Lewis, Zachary A.
    Selker, Eric U.
    Cresko, William A.
    Johnson, Eric A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (10):
  • [10] Comparing Genotyping-by-Sequencing and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Chip Genotyping for Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping in Wheat
    Bajgain, Prabin
    Rouse, Matthew N.
    Anderson, James A.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 56 (01) : 232 - 248