Amisulpride for the Rescue Treatment of Postoperative Nausea or Vomiting in Patients Failing Prophylaxis A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial

被引:40
作者
Habib, Ashraf S. [1 ]
Kranke, Peter [2 ]
Bergese, Sergio D. [3 ]
Chung, Frances [4 ]
Ayad, Sabry [5 ]
Siddiqui, Naveed [6 ]
Motsch, Johann [7 ]
Leiman, David G. [8 ]
Melson, Timothy, I [9 ]
Diemunsch, Pierre [10 ]
Fox, Gabriel M. [11 ]
Candiotti, Keith A. [12 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Univ Hosp Wurzburg, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Inst Anesthesiol,Outcomes Res,Fairview Hosp, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Dept Anesthesiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[8] Hermann Dr Surg Hosp, Houston, TX USA
[9] Helen Keller Hosp, Sheffield, AL USA
[10] CHU Hautepierre, Serv Anesthesie Reanimat Chirurgicale, Strasbourg, France
[11] Acacia Pharma Ltd, Cambridge, England
[12] Univ Miami, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Perioperat Med, Miami, FL USA
关键词
DOUBLE-BLIND; INTRAVENOUS AMISULPRIDE; ONDANSETRON; DROPERIDOL; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0000000000002509
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Although antiemetics are commonly used to prevent postoperative nausea or vomiting, the failure rate is appreciable and there is currently no generally accepted standard for rescue treatment of postoperative nausea or vomiting after failed prophylaxis. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was designed to test the hypothesis that intravenous amisulpride, a dopamine D-2/D-3-antagonist, is superior to placebo at treating established postoperative nausea or vomiting after failed prophylaxis. Methods: A total of 2,285 adult patients undergoing surgery under general inhalational anesthesia and receiving standard antiemetic prophylaxis were enrolled at 23 sites in Canada, France, Germany, and the United States. Of these, 702 patients experienced postoperative nausea or vomiting in the 24-h period after surgery and were randomized to receive a single dose of 5 or 10 mg intravenous amisulpride or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as no emesis or rescue antiemetic use for 24 h after study drug administration, excluding emesis in the first 30 min. Secondary endpoints included incidence of emesis and rescue medication use, nausea burden, time to treatment failure, and length of stay in postanesthesia care unit and hospital. Results: Complete response occurred in significantly more patients receiving 10 mg amisulpride (96 of 230, 41.7%) than placebo (67 of 235, 28.5%), a 13.2% difference (95% CI, 4.6 to 21.8; odds ratio, 1.80; P = 0.006). A 5-mg dose of amisulpride did not show a significant benefit (80 of 237, 33.8%); the difference from placebo was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1 to 13.6; odds ratio, 1.24; P = 0.109). The total number of adverse events recorded and proportion of patients with at least one adverse event were comparable between the placebo and amisulpride groups. No clinically relevant toxicities were observed. Conclusions: A single 10-mg dose of intravenous amisulpride was safe and more effective than placebo at treating established postoperative nausea or vomiting in patients failing postoperative nausea or vomiting prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 212
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting -: Conclusions from cross-validations between two centers [J].
Apfel, CC ;
Läärä, E ;
Koivuranta, M ;
Greim, CA ;
Roewer, N .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (03) :693-700
[2]   Assessment of postoperative nausea using a visual analogue scale [J].
Boogaerts, JG ;
Vanacker, E ;
Seidel, L ;
Albert, A ;
Bardiau, FM .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (04) :470-474
[3]   Granisetron versus ondansetron treatment for breakthrough postoperative nausea and vomiting after prophylactic ondansetron failure: A pilot study [J].
Candiotti, Keith A. ;
Nhuch, Fani ;
Kamat, Aimee ;
Deepika, Krisnaprasad ;
Arheart, Kristopher L. ;
Birnbach, David J. ;
Lubarsky, David A. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (06) :1370-1373
[4]   Palonosetron versus ondansetron as rescue medication for postoperative nausea and vomiting: a randomized, multicenter, open-label study [J].
Candiotti, Keith A. ;
Ahmed, Syed Raza ;
Cox, David ;
Gan, Tong J. .
BMC PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 15
[5]   Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery [J].
Chung, F ;
Mezei, G .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (06) :1352-1359
[6]   Safety of amisulpride (Solian®):: a review of 11 clinical studies [J].
Coulouvrat, C ;
Dondey-Nouvel, L .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 14 (04) :209-218
[7]   Droperidol lengthens cardiac repolarization due to block of the rapid component of the delayed rectifier potassium current [J].
Drolet, B ;
Zhang, ST ;
Deschênes, D ;
Rail, J ;
Nadeau, S ;
Zhou, ZG ;
January, CT ;
Turgeon, J .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (12) :1597-1604
[8]   Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice [J].
Feldheiser, A. ;
Aziz, O. ;
Baldini, G. ;
Cox, B. P. B. W. ;
Fearon, K. C. H. ;
Feldman, L. S. ;
Gan, T. J. ;
Kennedy, R. H. ;
Ljungqvist, O. ;
Lobo, D. N. ;
Miller, T. ;
Radtke, F. F. ;
Ruiz Garces, T. ;
Schricker, T. ;
Scott, M. J. ;
Thacker, J. K. ;
Ytrebo, L. M. ;
Carli, F. .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 60 (03) :289-334
[9]   Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery - a prospective study [J].
Fortier, J ;
Chung, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1998, 45 (07) :612-619
[10]   Akathisia following low-dose droperidol for antiemesis in day-case patients [J].
Foster, PN ;
Stickle, BR ;
Laurence, AS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 51 (05) :491-494