Numerical simulation of bubble formation on orifice plates with a moving contact line

被引:42
作者
Chen, Yuming [1 ]
Mertz, Rainer [1 ]
Kulenovic, Rudi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Nucl Technol & Energy Syst IKE, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
BOUNDARY-CONDITIONS; DYNAMICS; MODEL; SURFACE; LIQUID; VOLUME; ANGLE; FLOW; IMPACT; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.07.007
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
The formation of bubbles oil an orifice plate involves a moving contact line, especially in case of poor wetting conditions. The dynamics of the moving contact line and contact angle have a significant impact on the bubble departure size. Therefore, for the numerical simulation, an appropriate contact line boundary condition is essential for a correct prediction of the bubble formation. Numerical tests have been performed on two kinds of contact line models, one is a contact line velocity dependent model (Model-A, a commonly used model) and the other is a stick-slip model (Model-B). The calculation results using Model-A depend greatly on the prescribed maximum contact line velocity. With Model-B a parameter-independent prediction can be obtained provided that the mesh is sufficiently fine. The dynamic advancing and receding contact angles, which are two required inputs to both models, have a significant influence on the predicted bubble departure diameter, if the contact line moves beyond the inner rim of the orifice. The effect of wettability on the bubble departure size is realized via the variation of the maximum contact diameter. When the contact line sticks to a small region near the inner rim of the orifice, such as the bubble formation on a thin-walled nozzle, the effects of the contact angle and contact line models are negligible. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 77
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Commun Math Sci
[2]   Contact angle dynamics in droplets impacting on flat surfaces with different wetting characteristics [J].
Bayer, Ilker S. ;
Megaridis, Constantine M. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2006, 558 :415-449
[3]   Experimental evidence of nonlocal hydrodynamic influence on the dynamic contact angle [J].
Blake, TD ;
Bracke, M ;
Shikhmurzaev, YD .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1999, 11 (08) :1995-2007
[4]   A CONTINUUM METHOD FOR MODELING SURFACE-TENSION [J].
BRACKBILL, JU ;
KOTHE, DB ;
ZEMACH, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1992, 100 (02) :335-354
[5]   Numerical study on the formation of Taylor bubbles in capillary tubes [J].
Chen, Yuming ;
Kulenovic, Rudi ;
Mertz, Rainer .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES, 2009, 48 (02) :234-242
[6]  
Chigarev N. B., 1986, J ENG PHYS THERMOPH+, V51, P398
[7]   NUMERICAL SOLUTION OF NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS [J].
CHORIN, AJ .
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 1968, 22 (104) :745-&
[9]  
Diez J. A., 2000, Phys. Rev. E, V63, DOI DOI 10.1103/PHYSREVE.63.011208
[10]   The effect of drop (bubble) size on advancing and receding contact angles for heterogeneous and rough solid surfaces as observed with sessile-drop and captive-bubble techniques [J].
Drelich, J ;
Miller, JD ;
Good, RJ .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1996, 179 (01) :37-50