共 8 条
A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT) Results From Ten Countries Across Three Continents
被引:28
作者:
Quirin, Markus
[1
,2
]
Wrobel, Monika
[3
]
Pala, Andrea Norcini
[4
]
Stieger, Stefan
[5
,6
]
Brosschot, Jos
[7
]
Kazen, Miguel
[8
]
Hicks, Joshua A.
[9
]
Mitina, Olga
[10
]
Shanchuan, Dong
[11
]
Lasauskaite, Ruta
[12
]
Silvestrini, Nicolas
[12
]
Steca, Patrizia
[13
]
Padun, Maria A.
[14
]
Kuhl, Julius
[8
]
机构:
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Phillips Univ Marburg, Dept Psychiat, Marburg, Germany
[3] Univ Lodz, Inst Psychol, Ul Smugowa 10-12, PL-91433 Lodz, Poland
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Univ Vienna, Dept Psychol, Vienna, Austria
[6] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, Constance, Germany
[7] Leiden Univ, Inst Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
[8] Univ Osnabruck, Inst Psychol, Osnabruck, Germany
[9] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Psychol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[10] Lomonosov Moscow State Univ, Dept Psychol, Moscow, Russia
[11] Southwest Univ, Sch Psychol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[12] Univ Geneva, Dept Psychol, Geneva, Switzerland
[13] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
[14] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, Moscow, Russia
基金:
瑞士国家科学基金会;
俄罗斯基础研究基金会;
关键词:
implicit affect;
indirect assessment;
positive affect;
negative affect;
metric invariance;
AFFECT SCHEDULE PANAS;
SELF-REPORT;
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES;
CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY;
GENDER DIFFERENCES;
COMMUNITY SAMPLE;
CIRCUMPLEX MODEL;
RESPONSE STYLES;
MOOD;
FACTORIAL;
D O I:
10.1027/1015-5759/a000315
中图分类号:
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号:
040203 ;
摘要:
Self-report measures of affect come with a number of difficulties that can be circumvented by using indirect measurement procedures. The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT) is a recently developed measure of automatic activation of representations of affective states and traits that draws on participants' ratings of the extent to which nonsense words purportedly originating from an artificial language bear positive or negative meaning. Here we compared psychometric properties of this procedure across 10 countries and provide versions in corresponding languages (Chinese, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Polish, Russian, and Spanish). The results suggest good reliability, metric invariance, and construct validity across countries and languages. The IPANAT thus turns out as a useful tool for the indirect assessment of affect in different languages and cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文