Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives

被引:7
作者
Naoum, S. J. [1 ]
Mutzelburg, P. R. [1 ]
Shumack, T. G. [1 ]
Thode, D. J. G. [1 ]
Martin, F. E. [1 ]
Ellakwa, A. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Dent, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
Dentine bonding; polymerization shrinkage; resin composite; resin modified glass-ionomer; Riva Bond LC; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; TOOTH DEFORMATION; DENTAL COMPOSITES; BOND STRENGTH; TEETH;
D O I
10.1111/adj.12265
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether employing resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives can reduce polymerization contraction stress generated at the interface of restorative composite adhesive systems. Methods: Five resin based adhesives (G Bond, Optibond-All-in-One, Optibond-Solo, Optibond-XTR and Scotchbond-Universal) and two resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives (Riva Bond-LC, Fuji Bond-LC) were analysed. Each adhesive was applied to bond restorative composite Filtek-Z250 to opposing acrylic rods secured within a universal testing machine. Stress developed at the interface of each adhesive-restorative composite system (n = 5) was calculated at 5-minute intervals over 6 hours. Results: The resin based adhesive-restorative composite systems (RBA-RCS) demonstrated similar interface stress profiles over 6 hours; initial rapid contraction stress development (0-300 seconds) followed by continued contraction stress development = 0.02MPa/s (300 seconds -6 hours). The interface stress profile of the resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesive-restorative composite systems (RMGIBA-RCS) differed substantially to the RBA-RCS in several ways. Firstly, during 0-300 seconds the rate of contraction stress development at the interface of the RMGIBA-RCS was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than at the interface of the RBA-RCS. Secondly, at 300 seconds and 6 hours the interface contraction stress magnitude of the RMGIBA-RCS was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the stress of all assessed RBA-RCS. Thirdly, from 300 seconds to 6 hours both the magnitude and rate of interface stress of the RMGIBA-RCS continued to decline over the 6 hours from the 300 seconds peak. Conclusions: The use of resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives can significantly reduce the magnitude and rate of polymerization contraction stress developed at the interface of adhesive-restorative composite systems.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 496
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Gap measurement and bond strength of five selected adhesive systems bonded to tooth structure [J].
Arbabzadeh, F ;
Gage, JP ;
Young, WG ;
Shahabi, S ;
Swenson, SM .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 43 (03) :175-180
[2]   Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations - a 3D finite element analysis [J].
Ausiello, P ;
Apicella, A ;
Davidson, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2002, 18 (04) :295-303
[3]   Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: A systematic review [J].
Braga, RR ;
Ballester, RY ;
Ferracane, JL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2005, 21 (10) :962-970
[4]   Alternatives in polymerization contraction stress management [J].
Braga, RR ;
Ferracane, JL .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2004, 15 (03) :176-184
[5]  
Dauvillier B S, 2000, J Esthet Dent, V12, P291, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00238.x
[6]   Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting [J].
Dauvillier, BS ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
De Gee, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (03) :818-823
[7]   Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives [J].
Davidson, CL ;
Feilzer, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 1997, 25 (06) :435-440
[8]   An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations [J].
Deliperi, S ;
Bardwell, DN .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 133 (10) :1387-1398
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF WATER SORPTION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF SETTING SHRINKAGE STRESS IN TRADITIONAL AND RESIN-MODIFIED GLASS-IONOMER CEMENTS [J].
FEILZER, AJ ;
KAKABOURA, AI ;
DEGEE, AJ ;
DAVIDSON, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (03) :186-190
[10]   Contraction stress determinants in dimethacrylate composites [J].
Goncalves, F. ;
Pfeifer, C. S. ;
Ferracane, J. L. ;
Braga, R. R. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 87 (04) :367-371