Petrographic and XRF analyses of andesitic cut stone blocks at Teotihuacan, Mexico: implications for the organization of urban construction

被引:4
作者
Murakami, Tatsuya [1 ]
Boulanger, Matthew T. [2 ]
Glascock, Michael D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Anthropol, 6823 St Charles Ave,Dinwiddie Hall 101, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Southern Methodist Univ, Dept Anthropol, POB 750235, Dallas, TX 75275 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Res Reactor Ctr, Archaeometry Lab, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cut stone blocks; Procurement; Petrography; XRF; Urbanism; Teotihuacan; Mesoamerica; PROVENANCE; EXCHANGE; AZTEC;
D O I
10.1007/s12520-018-0619-5
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This study presents preliminary results of petrographic and X-ray fluorescence analyses of cut stone blocks used for urban construction at Teotihuacan, the capital of a regional state in Central Mexico (ca. AD 150-650). Cut stone blocks were concentrated in the civic-ceremonial core of the city and were probably prestigious architectural elements due to their higher costs of procurement and transportation compared to alternative materials (boulders and clay amalgam). This suggests that the organization of stone block procurement and distribution was likely embedded in power relations between commissioners and mining groups. By combining multiple analytical methods that complement one another, this study was able to discriminate local (within 10-15km radius) from non-local materials. The results suggest that the majority (>80%) of andesitic cut stone blocks were brought from non-local sources. This paper discusses procurement organization and suggests that most rocks were quarried by specialized groups and brought to the city through a tribute system and/or patron-client relations. This has implications for understanding the nature of the urban-hinterland relationship and expansion of the Teotihuacan state.
引用
收藏
页码:1491 / 1518
页数:28
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abrams ElliotM., 1994, MAYA BUILT THEIR WOR
[2]  
Allen R.O., 1989, ADV CHEM SER, P576
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, TEOTIHUACAN MAP 1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CHEM CHARACTERIZATIO
[5]   PROVENANCE OF THE LIMESTONE USED IN TEOTIHUACAN (MEXICO): A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH [J].
Barba, L. ;
Blancas, J. ;
Manzanilla, L. R. ;
Ortiz, A. ;
Barca, D. ;
Crisci, G. M. ;
Miriello, D. ;
Pecci, A. .
ARCHAEOMETRY, 2009, 51 :525-545
[6]  
Barba Pingarron Luis A., 2010, Materiales y energia en la arquitectura de Teotihuacan
[7]  
Barba Pingarron Luis A., 2005, ARQUIT URBAN, P211
[8]  
Baxter M., 1992, COMPUTER APPL QUANTI, VS577, P141
[9]  
Baxter M.J., 2000, Modern Analytical Methods in Art and Archaeology, P681
[10]   APPLICATION OF MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQUES TO ANALYTICAL DATA ON AEGEAN CERAMICS [J].
BIEBER, AM ;
BROOKS, DW ;
HARBOTTLE, G ;
SAYRE, EV .
ARCHAEOMETRY, 1976, 18 (FEB) :59-74