The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meat

被引:82
|
作者
Koistinen, L. [1 ]
Pouta, E. [1 ]
Heikkila, J. [1 ]
Forsman-Hugg, S. [1 ]
Kotro, J. [1 ]
Makela, J. [2 ]
Niva, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] MTT Agrifood Res Finland, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Teacher Educ, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Natl Consumer Res Ctr, FI-00531 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Consumer preferences; Heterogeneity; Choice experiment; Latent class analysis; Willingness to pay; Meat; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; FARM-ANIMAL WELFARE; FOOD SAFETY; ATTITUDES; BEEF; HETEROGENEITY; BEHAVIOR; FINNISH; DEMAND; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.007
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Growing concern over the environmental impacts and other credence characteristics of food has resulted in increasing interest in the quality attributes of meat products in Finland. The aim of this study was to provide information on the relative preferences of consumers for minced meat attributes. Using a choice experiment, we examined whether the meat type, method of production, fat content, price and presence of carbon footprint information have an impact on consumer choice. A low fat content was found to have a particularly positive effect on the choice of a minced meat product. The carbon footprint information had a significant impact on the meat type-specific consumer preferences: the popularity of beef products decreased and of pork products increased when the footprint information was presented to the consumers. Six heterogeneous consumer classes were identified with latent class analysis: price-conscious (23% of the respondents), fat content-conscious (23%), ideological but passive (17%), content with conventional (14%), beef-preferring (12%) and method of production -conscious consumers (11%). Consumers were generally willing to pay more for a low fat content, but the relative willingness to pay estimates were largely dependent on the consumer groups: premiums for organic and animal welfare-oriented production methods also existed. These attributes could thus represent good means for differentiating minced meat products. The impact of carbon footprint information on the willingness to pay estimates was relatively low. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 136
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Consumer preferences for farm-raised meat, lab-grown meat, and plant-based meat alternatives: Does information or brand matter?
    Van Loo, Ellen J.
    Caputo, Vincenzina
    Lusk, Jayson L.
    FOOD POLICY, 2020, 95
  • [22] Effect of life cycle inventory choices and nutritional variation on carbon footprint of broiler meat production
    Alkhtib, Ashraf
    Burton, Emily
    Wilson, Philippe B.
    Scholey, Dawn
    Bentley, James
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 383
  • [23] Piloting Citizen Science Methods to Measure Perceptions of Carbon Footprint and Energy Content of Food
    Armstrong, Beth
    Bridge, Gemma
    Oakden, Libby
    Reynolds, Christian
    Wang, Changqiong
    Panzone, Luca A.
    Rivera, Ximena Schmidt
    Kause, Astrid
    Ffoulkes, Charles
    Krawczyk, Coleman
    Miller, Grant
    Serjeant, Stephen
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2020, 4
  • [24] The influence of disclosing product lifecycle carbon footprint information on consumer purchase intentions based on the APE model perspective: An ERP and questionnaire study
    Lv, Dong
    Sun, Rui
    Zuo, Jiajia
    Zhu, Qiuhua
    Qing, Shukun
    Xu, Ying
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 96
  • [25] Linking Dark Chocolate Product Attributes, Consumer Preferences, and Consumer Utility: Impact of Quality Labels, Cocoa Content, Chocolate Origin, and Price
    Sepulveda, Wilmer S.
    Maza, Maria Teresa
    Uldemolins, Pilar
    Cantos-Zambrano, Elio G.
    Ureta, Irinuska
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FOOD & AGRIBUSINESS MARKETING, 2022, 34 (05) : 518 - 537
  • [26] Cookie cravings - Examining the impact of sugar content information on Christmas treat preferences via mobile eye-tracking
    Potthoff, Jonas
    Herrmann, Christina
    Schienle, Anne
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2024, 245
  • [27] Consumer preferences for sustainable production methods in apple purchasing behaviour: a non-hypothetical choice experiment
    Moser, Riccarda
    Raffaelli, Roberta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2012, 36 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [28] Consumer Preferences for Low-Methane Beef: The Impact of Pre-Purchase Information, Point-of-Purchase Labels, and Increasing Prices
    Davidson, Kelly A.
    Mcfadden, Brandon R.
    Meyer, Sarah
    Bernard, John C.
    FOOD POLICY, 2025, 130
  • [29] Is transparency a good business strategy? Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for information about the chemical content of reused and recycled clothing
    Hunka, Agnieszka D.
    Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu
    Bour, Agathe
    Boyer, Robert H. W.
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2025, 56 : 128 - 141
  • [30] Methods of Minimizing Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Content in Homogenized Smoked Meat Sausages Using Different Casings and Variants of Meat-Fat Raw Material
    Ciecierska, Marta
    Dasiewicz, Krzysztof
    Wolosiak, Rafal
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (22)