The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meat

被引:82
|
作者
Koistinen, L. [1 ]
Pouta, E. [1 ]
Heikkila, J. [1 ]
Forsman-Hugg, S. [1 ]
Kotro, J. [1 ]
Makela, J. [2 ]
Niva, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] MTT Agrifood Res Finland, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Teacher Educ, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] Natl Consumer Res Ctr, FI-00531 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Consumer preferences; Heterogeneity; Choice experiment; Latent class analysis; Willingness to pay; Meat; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; FARM-ANIMAL WELFARE; FOOD SAFETY; ATTITUDES; BEEF; HETEROGENEITY; BEHAVIOR; FINNISH; DEMAND; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.03.007
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Growing concern over the environmental impacts and other credence characteristics of food has resulted in increasing interest in the quality attributes of meat products in Finland. The aim of this study was to provide information on the relative preferences of consumers for minced meat attributes. Using a choice experiment, we examined whether the meat type, method of production, fat content, price and presence of carbon footprint information have an impact on consumer choice. A low fat content was found to have a particularly positive effect on the choice of a minced meat product. The carbon footprint information had a significant impact on the meat type-specific consumer preferences: the popularity of beef products decreased and of pork products increased when the footprint information was presented to the consumers. Six heterogeneous consumer classes were identified with latent class analysis: price-conscious (23% of the respondents), fat content-conscious (23%), ideological but passive (17%), content with conventional (14%), beef-preferring (12%) and method of production -conscious consumers (11%). Consumers were generally willing to pay more for a low fat content, but the relative willingness to pay estimates were largely dependent on the consumer groups: premiums for organic and animal welfare-oriented production methods also existed. These attributes could thus represent good means for differentiating minced meat products. The impact of carbon footprint information on the willingness to pay estimates was relatively low. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 136
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The Impact of Information on Consumer Preferences for Different Animal Food Production Methods
    Morten Raun Mørkbak
    Jonas Nordström
    Journal of Consumer Policy, 2009, 32 (4) : 313 - 331
  • [2] The Impact of Information on Consumer Preferences for Different Animal Food Production Methods
    Morkbak, Morten Raun
    Nordstrom, Jonas
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER POLICY, 2009, 32 (04) : 313 - 331
  • [3] Who cares about meat carbon footprint? Exploring preferences for credence factors among Australian consumers
    De Valck, Jeremy
    Rolfe, John
    Star, Megan
    Rajapaksa, Darshana
    Burton, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 418
  • [4] Consumer choice of broiler meat: The effects of country of origin and production methods
    Pouta, E.
    Heikkila, J.
    Forsman-Hugg, S.
    Isoniemi, M.
    Makela, J.
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2010, 21 (05) : 539 - 546
  • [5] Impact of Hormone Use Perceptions on Consumer Meat Preferences
    Yang, Ruoye
    Raper, Kellie Curry
    Lusk, Jayson L.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 45 (01) : 107 - 123
  • [6] Consumer Preferences for Different Designs of Carbon Footprint Labelling on Tomatoes in GermanyDoes Design Matter?
    Meyerding, Stephan G. H.
    Schaffmann, Anna-Lena
    Lehberger, Mira
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [7] Consumer stated preferences for dairy products with carbon footprint labels in Italy
    Maurizio Canavari
    Silvia Coderoni
    Agricultural and Food Economics, 8
  • [8] Consumer stated preferences for dairy products with carbon footprint labels in Italy
    Canavari, Maurizio
    Coderoni, Silvia
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD ECONOMICS, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [9] Perception of fat and other quality parameters in minced and burger meat from Spanish consumer studies
    Cardona, Maria
    Gorriz, Amaia
    Barat, Jose M.
    Fernandez-Segovia, Isabel
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2020, 166 (166)
  • [10] Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production?
    Roos, Elin
    Sundberg, Cecilia
    Tidaker, Pernilla
    Strid, Ingrid
    Hansson, Per-Anders
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 : 573 - 581