Life-Cycle-Based Multicriteria Sustainability Evaluation of Industrial Parks: A Case Study in China

被引:10
作者
Yang, Jin [1 ]
Chen, Bin [1 ]
Qi, Jing [1 ]
Zhou, Shiyi [2 ]
Jiang, Meiming [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Dev Area Co Ltd, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL | 2012年
关键词
ENERGY; CONSUMPTION; MITIGATION; EMISSIONS; RESOURCE; IMPACTS; NETWORK; CARBON; EMERGY;
D O I
10.1100/2012/917830
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Along with increasing concerns on environmental protection and global warming mitigation, new industrial organization modes such as "Ecoindustrial Park" and "Low Carbon Industrial Park" are emerging. Since ecoindustrial parks and low carbon industrial parks may offer multifaceted benefits to the users, it naturally follows that the sustainability assessment of the industrial parks ought to adopt a multicriteria methodology. In this paper, a multicriteria sustainable evaluation framework is proposed in combination with the life cycle analysis and applied to a low carbon and high end industrial park (LCHE) in Beijing, China. Results show that the LCHE industrial park can contribute to both energy-saving and greenhouse gas emission mitigations compared with other industrial parks. In terms of economic performance, although the economic profits are considerable, the investment per constructed area is relatively high. The results of sustainable analysis of the LCHE industrial park can thus shed light on future upgrading of industrial parks.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Life Cycle Energy and GHG Emission Analysis for BEVs and PhEVs: A Case Study in China
    Xiong, Siqin
    Ji, Junping
    Ma, Xiaoming
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (05)
  • [42] Utilization of CO2 in renewable DME fuel production: A life cycle analysis (LCA)-based case study in China
    Tomatis, Marco
    Parvez, Ashak Mahmud
    Afzal, Muhammad T.
    Mareta, Sannia
    Wu, Tao
    He, Jun
    He, Tianbiao
    FUEL, 2019, 254
  • [43] Life cycle environmental impact of firewood production - A case study in Italy
    Pierobon, Francesca
    Zanetti, Michela
    Grigolato, Stefano
    Sgarbossa, Andrea
    Anfodillo, Tommaso
    Cavalli, Raffaele
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 150 : 185 - 195
  • [44] Life cycle assessment of car sharing models and the effect on GWP of urban transportation: A case study of Beijing
    Ding, Ning
    Pan, Jingjin
    Zhang, Zhan
    Yang, Jianxin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 688 : 1137 - 1144
  • [45] Investigating the environmental sustainability of a seabass and seabream aquaculture system in Portugal based on life cycle and nexus approaches
    Briones-Hidrovo, Andrei
    Quinteiro, Paula
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 890
  • [46] Life cycle value analysis for sustainability evaluation of bioenergy products
    Lee, Mengshan
    Den, Walter
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 : 541 - 547
  • [47] Life cycle thinking–based eco-compensation for gold ingot production: a case study in China
    Wei Chen
    Yong Geng
    Chengxin Wang
    Shaozhuo Zhong
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 4463 - 4471
  • [48] Sustainability evaluation of a steel production system in China based on emergy
    Pan, Hengyu
    Zhang, Xiaohong
    Wu, Jun
    Zhang, Yanzong
    Lin, Lili
    Yang, Gang
    Deng, Shihuai
    Li, Li
    Yu, Xiaoyu
    Qi, Hui
    Peng, Hong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 1498 - 1509
  • [49] Comprehensive benefit evaluation of eco-industrial parks by employing the best-worst method based on circular economy and sustainability
    Zhao, Haoran
    Guo, Sen
    Zhao, Huiru
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 20 (03) : 1229 - 1253
  • [50] Sustainability Assessment of Industrial Production of Pharmaceuticals Through a Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Mohan, S.
    Sruthy, S.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2022, 26 (04)