CEO incentive compensation and earnings management The implications of institutions and governance systems

被引:23
作者
Almadi, Madi [1 ]
Lazic, Philip [2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Grad Sch Business & Law, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] PricewaterhouseCoopers Int Ltd, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
Anglo-American corporate governance model; CEO incentive-based compensation; Euro-Continental corporate governance model; Institutional factors; Earnings management; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; INVESTOR PROTECTION; EQUITY INCENTIVES; DETERMINANTS; PERFORMANCE; INFORMATION; QUALITY; PRIVATE; AUDIT;
D O I
10.1108/MD-05-2016-0292
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of CEO incentive-based compensation on earnings management, taking into account the influence of institutional settings and corporate governance systems. Design/methodology/approach - Using archival data of 3,000 British, Australian, German, and Austrian firm-years between 2005 and 2014, the study applies fixed-effect estimator to reduce risks of endogeneity bias. Findings - The findings reveal that institutional factors influence the relationship between CEO incentive-based compensation and earnings management. Particularly, firms from countries within the Anglo-American model (the UK and Australia), which provide greater protection for investor, stricter legal enforcement, and higher quality of corporate governance, tend to have lower level of earnings management. However, besides corporate governance quality, it is relevant to consider weaker investor protection and legal enforcement to motivate earnings management in firms from countries within the Euro-Continental model (Germany and Austria). Originality/value - The study suggests that robust implementation of corporate governance, derived from either model, helps in restraining CEO opportunistic behavior. Importantly, more qualified institutions have higher impact on the relative adequacy of CEO incentive-based pay formulas in mitigating earnings management concerns. This can be extended by future research through comparative studies using other contexts or influential institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:2447 / 2461
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures [J].
Aboody, D ;
Kasznik, R .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2000, 29 (01) :73-100
[2]   CEO tenure and earnings management [J].
Ali, Ashiq ;
Zhang, Weining .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2015, 59 (01) :60-79
[3]   The ethics of managerial compensation: The case of executive stock options [J].
Angel, James J. ;
McCabe, Douglas M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 78 (1-2) :225-235
[4]  
[Anonymous], J INT ACCOUNTING RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], REV FINANCE REV FINA
[6]   The determinants of corporate sustainability performance [J].
Artiach, Tracy ;
Lee, Darren ;
Nelson, David ;
Walker, Julie .
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2010, 50 (01) :31-51
[7]   Private information, earnings manipulations, and executive stock-option exercises [J].
Bartov, E ;
Mohanram, P .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2004, 79 (04) :889-920
[8]   Executive compensation as an agency problem [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2003, 17 (03) :71-92
[9]   Executive compensation, share repurchases and investment expenditures: Econometric evidence from US firms [J].
Bhargava A. .
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2013, 40 (3) :403-422
[10]   The Determinants and Performance Effects of Managers' Performance Evaluation Biases [J].
Bol, Jasmijn C. .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2011, 86 (05) :1549-1575