Bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets

被引:37
作者
Egan, FR [1 ]
Alexander, SA [1 ]
Cartwright, GE [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY STONY BROOK,SCH DENT MED,STONY BROOK,NY 11974
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70164-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
A study was undertaken to determine the bond strength of brackets rebonded with a no-mix resin system or a paste-paste resin system. The efficacy of plastic conditioner and Enhance adhesion booster (Reliance Orthondontic Products, Inc., Itasca, Ill.) as an aid in rebonding was also evaluated. Sixty extracted human premolars were divided into two groups based on the two adhesive systems used. Both groups of 30 were subdivided and (1) initial bond, (2) rebond, and (3) rebond using plastic conditioner and adhesion booster. Samples were stressed to bond failure using an Instron machine. Bond separation occurred in the majority of samples at the enamel/resin interface. Mean bond strengths ranged from 78.8 kg cm(-2) for rebonding with a no-mix adhesive and no other conditioners, to 182.7 kg cm(-2) for initial bonding using a paste-paste adhesive. Rebonding using a paste-paste adhesive with no other conditioners produced a bond strength statistically indistinguishable from initial bonding with either system. Plastic conditioner and adhesion booster failed to improve rebond strength. The data suggest that, given certain circumstances, rebonding is a viable option when a bracket has been debonded.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 70
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH CRYSTAL-GROWTH CONDITIONING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO ACID-ETCH ENAMEL PRETREATMENT [J].
ARTUN, J ;
BERGLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1984, 85 (04) :333-340
[2]   BONDING OF BOVINE ENAMEL TO RESTORATIVE RESIN - EFFECT OF PRETREATMENT OF ENAMEL [J].
BRAUER, GM ;
TERMINI, DJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1972, 51 (01) :151-+
[3]   TENSILE BOND STRENGTHS OF ORTHODONTIC BONDING RESINS AND ATTACHMENTS TO ETCHED ENAMEL [J].
BRYANT, S ;
RETIEF, DH ;
RUSSELL, CM ;
DENYS, FR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 92 (03) :225-231
[4]  
CARSTENSEN W, 1992, ANGLE ORTHOD, V62, P51
[5]   SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF 4 ORTHODONTIC BONDING SYSTEMS [J].
COREIL, MN ;
MCINNESLEDOUX, P ;
LEDOUX, WR ;
WEINBERG, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1990, 97 (02) :126-129
[6]   A LABORATORY EVALUATION OF THE TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF SOME ORTHODONTIC BONDING RESINS TO ENAMEL [J].
DELPORT, A ;
GROBLER, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 93 (02) :133-137
[7]  
Denys F R, 1982, J Dent Assoc S Afr, V37, P185
[8]   FACTORS AFFECTING INVITRO BOND STRENGTH OF NO-MIX ORTHODONTIC CEMENTS [J].
EVANS, LB ;
POWERS, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 87 (06) :508-512
[10]   PENETRATION COEFFICIENT, TENSILE-STRENGTH, AND BOND STRENGTH OF 13 DIRECT BONDING ORTHODONTIC CEMENTS [J].
FAUST, JB ;
GREGO, GN ;
ODONT, S ;
FAN, PL ;
POWERS, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1978, 73 (05) :512-525