Reliability and comparison of gain values with occurrence of saccades in the EyeSeeCam video head impulse test (vHIT)

被引:26
作者
Korsager, Leise Elisabeth Hviid [1 ]
Schmidt, Jesper Hvass [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Faber, Christian [1 ]
Wanscher, Jens Hojberg [1 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept ENT Head & Neck Surg, Sdr Blvd 29, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Audiol, Sdr Blvd 29, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Res, Sdr Blvd 29, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
关键词
Video head impulse test; vHIT; Saccades; Vestibulo-ocular reflex; VOR; EyeSeeCam; Vestibulopathy; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-016-4183-2
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The vHIT (video head impulse test) investigates the vestibular function in two ways: a VOR (vestibulo-ocular reflex) gain value and a head impulse diagram. From the diagram covert and overt saccades can be detected. Evaluation of the vestibular function based on vHIT depends on both parameters. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the reliability of the two parameters. The objective was to investigate the reliability of vHIT by comparing gain values between examiners on the same subjects, and to see how differences affected the occurrence of saccades. Subjects: 25 subjects who had undergone cochlear implant (CI) surgery. Subjects were tested using the vHIT by two of four different examiners. Two judges interpreted the occurrence of saccades in the diagram. Main Outcome Measures: VOR gain values and the occurrence of saccades in the diagram. Differences in gain values between examiners varied from 0.2 to 0.58 with an average of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.12-0.16) on the right ear and 0.17 (95 % CI 0.15-0.19) on the left ear. Occurrences of saccades in the same patient were reproduced in 93 % of the cases by all examiners. Kappa's coefficient on the occurrence of saccades was 0.83. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of the gain values between examiners ranged from 0.62 to 0.70. Differences in gain values amongst examiners did not seem to affect the occurrence of saccades in the same patient. The occurrence of saccades, therefore, seems to be more reliable than the gain value in the evaluation of the vestibular function. Interpretation of vHIT results should, therefore, first depend on the occurrence of saccades and second on the gain value.
引用
收藏
页码:4273 / 4279
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Three-dimensional vector analysis of the human vestibuloocular reflex in response to high-acceleration head rotations .1. Responses in normal subjects
    Aw, ST
    Haslwanter, T
    Halmagyi, GM
    Curthoys, IS
    Yavor, RA
    Todd, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 76 (06) : 4009 - 4020
  • [2] Beynon GJ, 1998, CLIN OTOLARYNGOL, V23, P117
  • [3] Detection of isolated covert saccades with the video head impulse test in peripheral vestibular disorders
    Bloedow, Alexander
    Pannasch, Sebastian
    Walther, Leif Erik
    [J]. AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2013, 40 (04) : 348 - 351
  • [4] A brief review of the clinical anatomy of the vestibular-ocular connections-how much do we know?
    Bronstein, A. M.
    Patel, M.
    Arshad, Q.
    [J]. EYE, 2015, 29 (02) : 163 - 170
  • [5] Curthoys IS, 2011, CLIN APPL NEW OBJECT
  • [6] Fetter Michael, 2007, Dev Ophthalmol, V40, P35
  • [7] Kidd C, 2015, INTRA INTEREXAMINER
  • [8] The video head impulse test Diagnostic accuracy in peripheral vestibulopathy
    MacDougall, H. G.
    Weber, K. P.
    McGarvie, L. A.
    Halmagyi, G. M.
    Curthoys, I. S.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2009, 73 (14) : 1134 - 1141
  • [9] The Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) Detects Vertical Semicircular Canal Dysfunction
    MacDougall, Hamish Gavin
    McGarvie, Leigh Andrew
    Halmagyi, Gabor Michael
    Curthoys, Ian Stewart
    Weber, Konrad Peter
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (04):
  • [10] Normative Data on Angular Vestibulo-Ocular Responses in the Yaw Axis Measured Using the Video Head Impulse Test
    Matino-Soler, Eusebi
    Esteller-More, Eduard
    Martin-Sanchez, Juan-Carlos
    Martinez-Sanchez, Jose-M.
    Perez-Fernandez, Nicolas
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (03) : 466 - 471