EUS and/or EUS-guided FNA in patients with CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings of enlarged pancreatic head or dilated pancreatic duct with or without a dilated common bile duct

被引:63
作者
Agarwal, Banke [1 ]
Krishna, Naveen B. [1 ]
Labundy, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Safdar, Rizwan [1 ]
Akduman, Ece I. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.026
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Incidental findings of an enlarged head of pancreas (HOP) or dilated pancreatic duct (PD) with or without a dilated common bile duct (CBD) on CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients without obstructive jaundice, raise suspicion for a pancreatic neoplasm, but their clinical significance has not been established. Objective: To determine the prevalance of pancreatic neoplasm in this patient group. Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Setting: Tertiary-care university hospital. Patients: Patients without obstructive jaundice at initial presentation, who underwent EUS and/or EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) for an abnormal CT and/or MRI with an enlarged HOP (n = 67) or a PD with or without a dilated CBD (n = 43). The final diagnosis was based on definitive cytology, surgical pathology, and clinical follow-up. Interventions: An EUS examination was performed by using a radial echoendoscopic followed by a linear echoendoscopic, if a focal pancreatic lesion was identified. Fine-needle aspirates were stained with Diff-Quik and Papanicolaou's methods, and were immediately assessed by an attending cytopathologist. Main Outcome Measurements: (1) The prevalence of pancreatic neoplasms and (2) performance characteristics of EUS-FNA for identifying malignant neoplasm, in this patient group. Results: In 110 study the final diagnosis included adenocarcinoma (n = 7), pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 1), neuroendocrine tumour (n = 1), tumour metastasis (n = 1), and benign cyst (n = 3). Thirty-two patients had EUS evidence of chronic pancreatitis, and, in the remaining 65 patients, the pancreas was normal. The accuracy of EUS and EUS-FNA for diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm in these patients was 99.1%, With 88.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 99% negative predicative value, and 100% positive predictive value. Limitation: A retrospective design and surgical confirmation in only a small number of study patients "Conclusion: A pancreatic neoplasm is seen in a clinically significant number of patients with "enlarged HOP" or "dilated PD with or without a dilated CBD" but without obstructive jaundice. EUS-FNA seems highly accurate for diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Endoscopic ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiation can help identify patients who benefit maximally after surgical esophageal resection
    Agarwal, B
    Swisher, S
    Ajani, J
    Kelly, K
    Fanning, C
    Komaki, RR
    Putnam, JB
    Abu-Hamda, E
    Molke, KL
    Walsh, GL
    Correa, AM
    Ho, L
    Liao, ZX
    Lynch, PM
    Rice, DC
    Smythe, WR
    Stevens, CW
    Vaporciyan, AA
    Yao, J
    Roth, JA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (07) : 1258 - 1266
  • [2] Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study
    Brugge, WR
    Lewandrowski, K
    Lee-Lewandrowski, E
    Centeno, BA
    Szydlo, T
    Regan, S
    del Castillo, CF
    Warshaw, AL
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (05) : 1330 - 1336
  • [3] Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS
    Catanzaro, A
    Richardson, S
    Veloso, H
    Isenberg, GA
    Wong, RCK
    Sivak, MV
    Chak, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (06) : 836 - 840
  • [4] Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer
    DeWitt, J
    Devereaux, B
    Chriswell, M
    McGreevy, K
    Howard, T
    Imperiale, TF
    Ciaccia, D
    Lane, KA
    Maglinte, D
    Kopecky, K
    LeBlanc, J
    McHenry, L
    Madura, J
    Aisen, A
    Cramer, H
    Cummings, O
    Sherman, S
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (10) : 753 - 763
  • [5] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications
    Eloubeidi, MA
    Chen, VK
    Eltoum, IA
    Jhala, D
    Chhieng, DC
    Jhala, N
    Vickers, SM
    Wilcox, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (12) : 2663 - 2668
  • [6] Time interval between abnormalities seen on CT and the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Retrospective review of CT scans obtained before diagnosis
    Gangi, S
    Fletcher, JG
    Nathan, MA
    Christensen, JA
    Harmsen, WS
    Crownhart, BS
    Chari, ST
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) : 897 - 903
  • [7] A single-center experience of endoscopic ultrasonography for enlarged pancreas on computed tomography
    Ho, S
    Bonasera, RJ
    Pollack, BJ
    Grendell, J
    Feuerman, M
    Gress, F
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [8] Hosoya T, 2000, Radiat Med, V18, P39
  • [9] ASGE guideline: complications of EUS
    Jacobson, BC
    Adler, DG
    Davila, RE
    Hirota, WK
    Leighton, JA
    Qureshi, WA
    Rajan, E
    Zuckerman, MJ
    Fanelli, RD
    Baron, TH
    Faigel, DO
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (01) : 8 - 12
  • [10] Kirchin Miles A, 2003, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V14, P426, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200310000-00007