The relationship between national culture and safety culture: Implications for international safety culture assessments

被引:32
作者
Noort, Mark C. [1 ,2 ]
Reader, Tom W. [1 ]
Shorrock, Steven [3 ,4 ]
Kirwan, Barry [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, London, England
[2] NATS, Whitely, England
[3] EUROCONTROL, Bretigny Sur Orge, France
[4] Univ New South Wales, Sch Aviat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ORGANIZATIONAL SAFETY; PATIENT SAFETY; IQ GAINS; CLIMATE; MODEL; VALUES; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/joop.12139
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In this article, we examine the relationship between safety culture and national culture, and the implications of this relationship for international safety culture assessments. Focussing on Hofstede's uncertainty avoidance (UA) index, a survey study of 13,616 Air Traffic Management employees in 21 European countries found a negative association between safety culture and national norm data for UA. This is theorized to reflect the influence of national tendencies for UA upon attitudes and practices for managing safety (e.g., anxiety on risk; reliance on protocols; concerns over reporting incidents; openness to different perspectives). The relationship between UA and safety culture is likely to have implications for international safety culture assessments. Specifically, benchmarking exercises will consistently indicate safety management within organizations in high UA countries to be poorer than low UA countries due to the influence of national culture upon safety practices, which may limit opportunities for identifying and sharing best practice. We propose the use of safety culture against international group norms (SIGN) scores to statistically adjust for the influence of UA upon safety culture data, and to support the identification of safety practices effective and particular to low or high UA cultures.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 538
页数:24
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]   The silence of the library: Environment, situational norm, and social behavior [J].
Aarts, H ;
Dijksterhuis, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 84 (01) :18-28
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, RISK
[3]   Safety culture and the issue of power [J].
Antonsen, Stian .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2009, 47 (02) :183-191
[4]   Cross-validation of an employee safety climate model in Malaysia [J].
Bahari, Siti Fatimah ;
Clarke, Sharon .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2013, 45 :1-6
[5]   Cultural variations in strategic issue interpretation: Relating cultural uncertainty avoidance to controllability in discriminating threat and opportunity [J].
Barr, PS ;
Glynn, MA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2004, 25 (01) :59-67
[6]  
Beck Ulrich., 2000, The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory
[7]  
Berger PL, 1966, The Social Construction of Reality
[8]  
Berry JW, 1997, APPL PSYCHOL-INT REV, V46, P5, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
[9]   Safety Climate and Injuries: An Examination of Theoretical and Empirical Relationships [J].
Beus, Jeremy M. ;
Payne, Stephanie C. ;
Bergman, Mindy E. ;
Arthur, Winfred, Jr. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (04) :713-727
[10]  
Bhutta K.S., 1999, Benchmarking: An International Journal, V6, P254, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14635779910289261, 10.1108/14635779910289261]