Risk factors for early and late procedure-related adverse events in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A single center, retrospective study

被引:10
作者
Peveling-Oberhag, Jan [1 ,3 ]
Osman, Imad [1 ]
Walter, Dirk [1 ]
Filmann, Natalie [2 ]
Stratmann, Katharina [1 ]
Hausmann, Johannes [1 ]
Knop, Viola [1 ]
Waidmann, Oliver [1 ]
Vermehren, Johannes [1 ]
Herrmann, Eva [2 ]
Zeuzem, Stefan [1 ]
Friedrich-Rust, Mireen [1 ]
Blumenstein, Irina [1 ]
Albert, Joerg G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Internal Med 1, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ, Inst Biostat & Math Modeling, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Dept Internal Med 1, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
complication; endoscopy; esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD); oncology; percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG); predictors; CANCER-PATIENTS; MORTALITY; PULL; COMPLICATIONS; HEAD; PEG;
D O I
10.1111/jgh.14407
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) provides the most common method to ensure enteral nutrition for various indications. However, PEG placement may be associated with relevant procedure-related morbidity and mortality. We aimed to identify clinical parameters predicting an increased risk of PEG-related adverse events. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for all patients who had undergone PEG placement in our center between August 2010 and January 2014. PEG-related adverse events and risk factors were evaluated through review of endoscopic reports and medical charts. All patients were followed until death or study closure (median follow-up 30months, range 12-48). ResultsA total of 576 patients (417 male, mean age 56) were included. Indication for PEG insertion was preemptive or therapeutic in underlying oncological disease (n=410), neurological diseases (n=114), or others (n=151). The pull method was used in 501 patients (87%). Overall, 56 (59%) and 39 (41%) patients had early (<30days) and late (>30days) adverse events of which 11.8% and 4.7% were classified as minor and major, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that a high number of comorbidities, an oncological indication, and, as a statistical trend, high body mass index were associated with early adverse events. The use of the push method for insertion of PEG was associated with increased late adverse events, which mainly consisted of tube dislocations. ConclusionsClinical parameters that may easily be accessed correlate to an unfavorable outcome of a PEG procedure. This should raise the endoscopist's awareness for patients at high risk for adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 409
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [21] Enteral feeding in head and neck cancer patients at a UK cancer centre
    Sheth, C. H.
    Sharp, S.
    Walters, E. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2013, 26 (05) : 421 - 428
  • [22] Hospital and long-term outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
    Smith, Brian M.
    Perring, Paul
    Engoren, Milo
    Sferra, Joseph J.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [23] Assessment of indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy development of a predictive model
    Udd, Marianne
    Lindstrom, Outi
    Mustonen, Harri
    Back, Leif
    Halttunen, Jorma
    Kylanpaa, Leena
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 50 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [24] Vanis Nenad, 2012, Acta Inform Med, V20, P235, DOI 10.5455/aim.2012.20.235-237
  • [25] Predictive Factors of Mortality After PEG Insertion: Guidance for Clinical Practice
    Zopf, Yurdaguel
    Maiss, Juergen
    Konturek, Peter
    Rabe, Christina
    Hahn, Eckhart G.
    Schwab, Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2011, 35 (01) : 50 - 55