Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties

被引:132
作者
Keetharuth, Anju Devianee [1 ]
Brazier, John [1 ]
Connell, Janice [1 ]
Bjorner, Jakob Bue [2 ,3 ]
Carlton, Jill [1 ]
Buck, Elizabeth Taylor [1 ]
Ricketts, Thomas [1 ]
McKendrick, Kirsty [1 ]
Browne, John [4 ]
Croudace, Tim [5 ]
Barkham, Michael [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Optum Patient Insights, Lincoln, RI USA
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Cork, Ireland
[5] Univ Dundee, Dundee Ctr Hlth & Related Res, Dundee, Scotland
[6] Univ Sheffield, Ctr Psychol Serv Res, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[7] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
VALIDITY; EQ-5D; SCHIZOPHRENIA; DISORDER;
D O I
10.1192/bjp.2017.10
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Outcome measures for mental health services need to adopt a service-user recovery focus. Aims To develop and validate a 10- and 20-item self-report recovery-focused quality of life outcome measure named Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL). Method Qualitative methods for item development and initial testing, and quantitative methods for item reduction and scale construction were used. Data from >6500 service users were factor analysed and item response theory models employed to inform item selection. The measures were tested for reliability, validity and responsiveness. Results ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20 contain positively and negatively worded items covering seven themes: activity, hope, belonging and relationships, self-perception, well-being, autonomy, and physical health. Both versions achieved acceptable internal consistency, test-retest reliability (>0.85), known-group differences, convergence with related measures, and were responsive over time (standardised response mean (SRM) >0.4). They performed marginally better than the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale and markedly better than the EQ-5D. Conclusions Both versions are appropriate for measuring service-user recovery-focused quality of life outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, EEPRU technical research report 050. Policy research unit in economic evaluation of health and care interventions
[2]  
APA, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053
[3]   Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Toward practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies [J].
Barkham, M ;
Margison, F ;
Leach, C ;
Lucock, M ;
Mellor-Clark, J ;
Evans, C ;
Benson, L ;
Connell, J ;
Audin, K ;
McGrath, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 69 (02) :184-196
[4]   The CORE-10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies [J].
Barkham, Michael ;
Bewick, Bridgette ;
Mullin, Tracy ;
Gilbody, Simon ;
Connell, Janice ;
Cahill, Jane ;
Mellor-Clark, John ;
Richards, David ;
Unsworth, Gisela ;
Evans, Chris .
COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (01) :3-13
[5]   Measuring the benefits of treatment for psychosis: validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D [J].
Barton, Garry R. ;
Hodgekins, Jo ;
Mugford, Miranda ;
Jones, Peter B. ;
Croudace, Tim ;
Fowler, David .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 195 (02) :170-177
[6]   MARGINAL MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF ITEM PARAMETERS - APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM [J].
BOCK, RD ;
AITKIN, M .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1981, 46 (04) :443-459
[7]  
BRAMER G R, 1988, World Health Statistics Quarterly, V41, P32
[8]   A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures [J].
Brazier, John ;
Connell, Janice ;
Papaioannou, Diana ;
Mukuria, Clara ;
Mulhern, Brendan ;
Peasgood, Tessa ;
Jones, Myfawnwy Lloyd ;
Paisley, Suzy ;
O'Cathain, Alicia ;
Barkham, Michael ;
Knapp, Martin ;
Byford, Sarah ;
Gilbody, Simon ;
Parry, Glenys .
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2014, 18 (34) :1-+
[9]   Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in mental health? [J].
Brazier, John .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 197 (05) :348-349
[10]  
Cai L., 2011, IRTPRO FOR WINDOWS