Risk Factors for Cesarean Delivery in Preterm, Term and Post-Term Patients Undergoing Induction of Labor with an Unfavorable Cervix

被引:44
作者
Ennen, Christopher S. [1 ]
Bofill, James A. [2 ]
Magann, Everett F. [1 ,3 ]
Bass, John D. [4 ]
Chauhan, Suneet P. [5 ]
Morrison, John C. [2 ]
机构
[1] USN, Med Ctr Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA USA
[2] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Mat Fetal Med Fellowship Program, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[3] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Tennessee Dept Hlth, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Aurora Hlth Care, W Allis, WI USA
关键词
Cesarean delivery; Induction of labor; Risk factors; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; GESTATIONAL-AGE; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1159/000166307
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background/Aims: To identify risk factors for cesarean delivery in patients with an unfavorable cervix undergoing an indicated induction of labor. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of combined data from three prospective randomized trials comparing cervical ripening methods in singleton pregnancies with an unfavorable cervix seeking to identify risk factors for cesarean delivery. Results: Nine hundred and five women underwent an induction of labor for a variety of indications. Gestational age ranged from 27.0-42.8 weeks (mean of 37.8 weeks) and initial Bishop's score from 0-6 (mean 2.5). There were 613 vaginal deliveries (67.7%) and 292 cesarean deliveries (32.2%). Factors associated with an increased risk for cesarean delivery included nulliparous status, Bishop's score <= 1, body mass index >40 and diabetes mellitus. Conclusions: Risk factors for cesarean delivery in women undergoing an indicated induction include a low Bishop's score, high BMI, nulliparity and diabetes. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 117
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Prolonged pregnancy: Induction of labor and cesarean births [J].
Alexander, JM ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (06) :911-915
[2]   Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques [J].
Barrilleaux, PS ;
Bofill, JA ;
Terrone, DA ;
Magann, EF ;
May, WL ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) :1124-1129
[3]   Emergency cesarean delivery in induction of labor:: an evaluation of risk factors [J].
Cnattingius, R ;
Höglund, B ;
Kieler, H .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 84 (05) :456-462
[4]   Neonatal impact of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term: A comment on patient choice cesarean delivery [J].
Fogelson, NS ;
Menard, MK ;
Hulsey, T ;
Ebeling, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (05) :1433-1436
[5]   Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates [J].
Heffner, LJ ;
Elkin, E ;
Fretts, RC .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (02) :287-293
[6]   Neonatal morbidity after elective repeat cesarean section and trial of labor [J].
Hook, B ;
Kiwi, R ;
Amini, SB ;
Fanaroff, A ;
Hack, M .
PEDIATRICS, 1997, 100 (03) :348-353
[7]   Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: The physician effect [J].
Luthy, DA ;
Malmgren, JA ;
Zingheim, RW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (05) :1511-1515
[8]  
MARTIN JA, 2003, BIRTHS FINAL DATA 20, P54
[9]   Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term [J].
Maslow, AS ;
Sweeny, AL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :917-922
[10]  
Nuthalapaty FS, 2004, OBSTET GYNECOL, V103, P452