Quantitative Statistical Methods for Image Quality Assessment

被引:34
作者
Dutta, Joyita [1 ]
Ahn, Sangtae [2 ]
Li, Quanzheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Ctr Adv Med Imaging Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] GE Global Res Ctr, Niskayuna, NY USA
关键词
tomography; image quality metrics; local impulse response; resolution; variance; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION PROPERTIES; PENALIZED-LIKELIHOOD RECONSTRUCTION; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; NOISE PROPERTIES; EM ALGORITHM; FILTERED-BACKPROJECTION; ITERATIVE ALGORITHMS; OBSERVER PERFORMANCE; MAP RECONSTRUCTION; ESTIMATOR IMAGES;
D O I
10.7150/thno.6815
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Quantitative measures of image quality and reliability are critical for both qualitative interpretation and quantitative analysis of medical images. While, in theory, it is possible to analyze reconstructed images by means of Monte Carlo simulations using a large number of noise realizations, the associated computational burden makes this approach impractical. Additionally, this approach is less meaningful in clinical scenarios, where multiple noise realizations are generally unavailable. The practical alternative is to compute closed-form analytical expressions for image quality measures. The objective of this paper is to review statistical analysis techniques that enable us to compute two key metrics: resolution (determined from the local impulse response) and covariance. The underlying methods include fixed-point approaches, which compute these metrics at a fixed point (the unique and stable solution) independent of the iterative algorithm employed, and iteration-based approaches, which yield results that are dependent on the algorithm, initialization, and number of iterations. We also explore extensions of some of these methods to a range of special contexts, including dynamic and motion-compensated image reconstruction. While most of the discussed techniques were developed for emission tomography, the general methods are extensible to other imaging modalities as well. In addition to enabling image characterization, these analysis techniques allow us to control and enhance imaging system performance. We review practical applications where performance improvement is achieved by applying these ideas to the contexts of both hardware (optimizing scanner design) and image reconstruction (designing regularization functions that produce uniform resolution or maximize task-specific figures of merit).
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 756
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
[21]   Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): Applications to tomography [J].
Fessler, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (03) :493-506
[22]   Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: Space-invariant tomographs [J].
Fessler, JA ;
Rogers, WL .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1996, 5 (09) :1346-1358
[23]  
Fessler JA, 2004, IEEE NUCL SCI CONF R, P2022
[24]   PENALIZED WEIGHTED LEAST-SQUARES IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION FOR POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY [J].
FESSLER, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1994, 13 (02) :290-300
[25]   PENALIZED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION USING SPACE-ALTERNATING GENERALIZED EM ALGORITHMS [J].
FESSLER, JA ;
HERO, AO .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 1995, 4 (10) :1417-1429
[26]  
Fessler JA, 1997, IEEE NUCL SCI CONF R, P1599
[27]  
GILLAND DR, 1992, J NUCL MED, V33, P451
[28]  
Haldar JP, 2011, I S BIOMED IMAGING, P1676, DOI 10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872726
[29]   Exploring estimator bias-variance tradeoffs using the uniform CR bound [J].
Hero, AO ;
Fessler, JA ;
Usman, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1996, 44 (08) :2026-2041
[30]   ACCELERATED IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION USING ORDERED SUBSETS OF PROJECTION DATA [J].
HUDSON, HM ;
LARKIN, RS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1994, 13 (04) :601-609