Evidence for Direct Control of Eye Movements During Reading

被引:13
作者
Dambacher, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Slattery, Timothy J. [4 ]
Yang, Jinmian [5 ]
Kliegl, Reinhold [1 ]
Rayner, Keith [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Konstanz, Zukunftskolleg, D-78457 Constance, Germany
[3] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, D-78457 Constance, Germany
[4] Univ S Alabama, Dept Psychol, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
stimulus-onset delay; oculomotor control; fixation durations; sentence reading; E-Z READER; FIXATION DURATIONS; DISAPPEARING TEXT; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; COGNITIVE-CONTROL; STIMULUS ONSET; WORD-FREQUENCY; MODEL; ATTENTION; SACCADE;
D O I
10.1037/a0031647
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is well established that fixation durations during reading vary with processing difficulty, but there are different views on how oculomotor control, visual perception, shifts of attention, and lexical (and higher cognitive) processing are coordinated. Evidence for a one-to-one translation of input delay into saccadic latency would provide a much needed constraint for current theoretical proposals. Here, we tested predictions of such a direct-control perspective using the stimulus-onset delay (SOD) paradigm. Words in sentences were initially masked and, on fixation, were individually unmasked with a delay (0-, 33-, 66-, 99-ms SODs). In Experiment 1, SODs were constant for all words in a sentence; in Experiment 2, SODs were manipulated on target words, while nontargets were unmasked without delay. In accordance with predictions of direct control, nonzero SODs entailed equivalent increases in fixation durations in both experiments. Yet, a population of short fixations pointed to rapid saccades as a consequence of low-level information at nonoptimal viewing positions rather than of lexical processing. Implications of these results for theoretical accounts of oculomotor control are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1468 / 1484
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]   MANIPULATION OF STIMULUS ONSET DELAY IN READING - EVIDENCE FOR PARALLEL PROGRAMMING OF SACCADES [J].
MORRISON, RE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1984, 10 (05) :667-682
[22]   Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect [J].
Nuthmann, A ;
Engbert, R ;
Kliegl, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 2005, 45 (17) :2201-2217
[23]   The IOVP effect in mindless reading: Experiment and modeling [J].
Nuthmann, Antje ;
Engbert, Ralf ;
Kliegl, Reinhold .
VISION RESEARCH, 2007, 47 (07) :990-1002
[24]   Using CRISP to model global characteristics of fixation durations in scene viewing and reading with a common mechanism [J].
Nuthmann, Antje ;
Henderson, John M. .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2012, 20 (4-5) :457-494
[25]   CRISP: A Computational Model of Fixation Durations in Scene Viewing [J].
Nuthmann, Antje ;
Smith, Tim J. ;
Engbert, Ralf ;
Henderson, John M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (02) :382-405
[26]  
Pournelle G. H., 1953, Journal of Mammalogy, V34, P133, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1421:SDEOLC]2.0.CO
[27]  
2
[28]   Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research [J].
Rayner, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (03) :372-422
[29]   MASKING OF FOVEAL AND PARAFOVEAL VISION DURING EYE FIXATIONS IN READING [J].
RAYNER, K ;
INHOFF, AW ;
MORRISON, RE ;
SLOWIACZEK, ML ;
BERTERA, JH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1981, 7 (01) :167-179
[30]   EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL DURING READING - EVIDENCE FOR DIRECT CONTROL [J].
RAYNER, K ;
POLLATSEK, A .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 33 (NOV) :351-373