Evidence for Direct Control of Eye Movements During Reading

被引:13
作者
Dambacher, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Slattery, Timothy J. [4 ]
Yang, Jinmian [5 ]
Kliegl, Reinhold [1 ]
Rayner, Keith [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Dept Psychol, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Konstanz, Zukunftskolleg, D-78457 Constance, Germany
[3] Univ Konstanz, Dept Psychol, D-78457 Constance, Germany
[4] Univ S Alabama, Dept Psychol, Mobile, AL 36688 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
stimulus-onset delay; oculomotor control; fixation durations; sentence reading; E-Z READER; FIXATION DURATIONS; DISAPPEARING TEXT; INFORMATION EXTRACTION; COGNITIVE-CONTROL; STIMULUS ONSET; WORD-FREQUENCY; MODEL; ATTENTION; SACCADE;
D O I
10.1037/a0031647
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is well established that fixation durations during reading vary with processing difficulty, but there are different views on how oculomotor control, visual perception, shifts of attention, and lexical (and higher cognitive) processing are coordinated. Evidence for a one-to-one translation of input delay into saccadic latency would provide a much needed constraint for current theoretical proposals. Here, we tested predictions of such a direct-control perspective using the stimulus-onset delay (SOD) paradigm. Words in sentences were initially masked and, on fixation, were individually unmasked with a delay (0-, 33-, 66-, 99-ms SODs). In Experiment 1, SODs were constant for all words in a sentence; in Experiment 2, SODs were manipulated on target words, while nontargets were unmasked without delay. In accordance with predictions of direct control, nonzero SODs entailed equivalent increases in fixation durations in both experiments. Yet, a population of short fixations pointed to rapid saccades as a consequence of low-level information at nonoptimal viewing positions rather than of lexical processing. Implications of these results for theoretical accounts of oculomotor control are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1468 / 1484
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Bates D., 2010, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes
[2]   ANALYSIS OF THE SACCADIC SYSTEM BY MEANS OF DOUBLE STEP STIMULI [J].
BECKER, W ;
JURGENS, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1979, 19 (09) :967-983
[3]   Primer - The neural control of looking [J].
Carpenter, RHS .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2000, 10 (08) :R291-R293
[4]   Synchronizing timelines: Relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading [J].
Dambacher, Michael ;
Kliegl, Reinhold .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1155 :147-162
[5]  
Davies M., 2008, CORPUS CONT AM ENGLI
[6]   SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading [J].
Engbert, R ;
Nuthmann, A ;
Richter, EM ;
Kliegl, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2005, 112 (04) :777-813
[7]   Mathematical models of eye movements in reading: a possible role for autonomous saccades [J].
Engbert, R ;
Kliegl, R .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 2001, 85 (02) :77-87
[8]   Eye movements during scene viewing: Evidence for mixed control of flxation durations [J].
Henderson, John M. ;
Pierce, Graham L. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2008, 15 (03) :566-573
[9]   How are eye fixation durations controlled during scene viewing? Further evidence from a scene onset delay paradigm [J].
Henderson, John M. ;
Smith, Tim J. .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2009, 17 (6-7) :1055-1082
[10]   Semantic Preview Benefit in Eye Movements During Reading: A Parafoveal Fast-Priming Study [J].
Hohenstein, Sven ;
Laubrock, Jochen ;
Kliegl, Reinhold .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (05) :1150-1170