Inter-rater Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of Categories of Auditory Performance-II (CAP-II) Among Children With Cochlear Implant

被引:7
作者
Al-Shawi, Yazeed [1 ,2 ]
Mesallam, Tamer A. [3 ]
Alfallaj, Rayan [4 ]
Aldrees, Turki [5 ]
Albakheet, Nouf [6 ]
Alshawi, Moath [7 ]
Alotaibi, Tahani [8 ]
Algahtani, Ashwag [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Ear Specialist Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Prince Sultan Med Mil City, Otolaryngol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Voice Swallowing & Commun Disorders, Otolaryngol Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Med, Otolaryngol Dept, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
[6] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[7] British Aerosp Syst, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[8] King Abdulaziz Univ Hosp, ENT Dept, Commun & Swallowing Disorders Unit, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Categories of auditory performance-II (CAP-II); Cochlear implant; Interrater reliability; Pediatrics; Validation; SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002593
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Categories of Auditory Performance II (CAP-II) is an established audiological test that consists of a rating scale that can be used for prospective assessment of the auditory performance of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.Objective:To create and validate an Arabic version of Categories of Auditory Performance scale II (CAP-II), and to evaluate its reliability.Methods:In this cross-sectional study, 30 post-CI children (patients' group) along with 30 control subjects were included. The translated Arabic CAP-II scale has been used by speech-language pathologists and parents to evaluate the study subjects' auditory abilities. The interrater reliability, test-retest reliability, pre and postintervention score (responsiveness test), case versus control score comparison (discriminate validity), and cross-validation of the new Arabic version of CAP-II have been assessed.Results:The Arabic CAP-II demonstrated high test-retest and inter-rater reliability. There was a positive correlation between the Arabic CAP-II and Meaningful auditory integration scale. The Arabic CAP-II scores were higher in the patients' group compared with control subjects.Conclusion:The Arabic CAP-II showed high inter-rater reliability with excellent concurrent and discriminate validity. The Arabic version of CAP-II seems to be a valid and reliable tool in assessing different auditory performance in Arabic speaking children with hearing impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:E597 / E602
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Archbold S, 1995, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, V166, P312
[2]   Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability [J].
Archbold, S ;
Lutman, ME ;
Nikolopoulos, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (01) :7-11
[3]  
Carlson ML, 2015, OTOL NEUROTOL, V36, P43, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000607
[4]   Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5 [J].
Fang, Hsuan-Yeh ;
Ko, Hui-Chen ;
Wang, Nan-Mai ;
Fang, Tuan-Jen ;
Chao, Wei-Chieh ;
Tsou, Yung-Ting ;
Wu, Che-Ming .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 78 (05) :799-803
[5]  
Gilmour L, 2010, INTERRATER RELIABILI
[6]   Long-Term Outcomes, Education, and Occupational Level in Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Were Implanted in Childhood [J].
Illg, Angelika ;
Haack, Marius ;
Lesinski-Schiedat, Anke ;
Buechner, Andreas ;
Lenarz, Thomas .
EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (05) :577-587
[7]  
ROBBINS AM, 1991, AM J OTOL, V12, P144
[8]   Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline [J].
Sousa, Valmi D. ;
Rojjanasrirat, Wilaiporn .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 17 (02) :268-274
[9]  
Thawin Cheamchit, 2006, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V89, P1923
[10]   Construction of a molecular genetic map for hawthorn based on SRAP markers [J].
Wang, Gang ;
Guo, Yinshan ;
Zhao, Yuhui ;
Su, Kai ;
Zhang, Jijun .
BIOTECHNOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT, 2015, 29 (03) :441-447