Using multiple-choice questions to evaluate in-depth learning of economics

被引:36
作者
Buckles, S [1 ]
Siegfried, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Econ, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
关键词
assessment; in-depth learning; multiple-choice questions;
D O I
10.3200/JECE.37.1.48-57
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Multiple-choice questions are the basis of a significant portion of assessment in introductory economics courses. However, these questions, as found in course assessments, test banks, and textbooks, often fail to evaluate students' abilities to use and apply economic analysis. The authors conclude that multiple-choice questions can be used to measure some but not all elements of in-depth understanding of economics. The authors interpret in-depth understanding as ability to reason through logical steps when those steps and the relevant economic concepts are not explicitly stated. They present examples of multiple-choice questions that do and do not measure in-depth understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 57
页数:10
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Teaching methods in US undergraduate economics courses [J].
Becker, WE ;
Watts, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2001, 32 (03) :269-279
[2]   The relationship between multiple choice and essay response questions in assessing economics understanding [J].
Becker, WE ;
Johnston, C .
ECONOMIC RECORD, 1999, 75 (231) :348-357
[3]  
BURNO JE, 1989, J ECON EDUC, V20, P5
[4]  
CHAN N, 2001, SO EC J, V68, P957
[5]   PREFACE:: A millennial view of ecology and systematics, and ARES at age 30 [J].
Johnston, RF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 2000, 31 :1-7
[6]  
Krathwohl D. R., 1964, The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain
[7]   Do as I do, not as I say: Assessing outcomes when students think like economists [J].
Santos, J ;
Lavin, AM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2004, 35 (02) :148-161
[8]  
WALSTAD WB, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P193
[9]   Improving assessment in university economics [J].
Walstad, WB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2001, 32 (03) :281-294