Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients

被引:6
|
作者
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis [1 ,2 ]
Figueiredo, Nuno [3 ]
Bhuvanakrishna, Thakshyanee [2 ]
Harper, Mick [1 ]
Parvaiz, Amjad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Hlth & Care Profess, St Michaels Rd, Portsmouth PO1 2PR, Hants, England
[2] Poole Hosp NHS Trust, Longfleet Mad, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[3] Champalimaud Fdn, Av Brasilia, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; High risk; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; COLORECTAL SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ASSISTED RESECTION; HARM SCORE; OPEN-LABEL; FOLLOW-UP; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01892-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Obesity, neoadjuvant-radiotherapy, tumour proximity to the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery are factors that might increase the intra-operative difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether patients with these 'high-risk' characteristics are subject to worse short- or long-term outcomes is debated. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and long-term clinical and oncological outcomes of patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery with any of these high-risk characteristics and compare them with patients that do not possess any of these high-risk features. Methods For the purpose of this study data from consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer resections between 2006 and 2016 from two centres were analysed. High-risk patients were defined as patients with either one of the following characteristics: BMI >= 30, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, tumour < 8 cm from the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery. Results A total of 313 patients were identified (227 high risk, 86 low risk). Short-term outcomes were similar between the two groups with the exception of blood loss and length of stay, which were higher in the high-risk group (10 vs 2.5 ml,p = 0.045; 7 vs 5 days,p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79.7% vs 79.8%,p = 0.757), disease-free survival (76.8% vs 69.3%,p = 0.175), distant disease-free interval (84.8% vs 79.7%,p = 0.231) and local recurrence-free interval (100%, 97.4%,p = 0.162) between the two groups. Conclusion Similar short- and long-term outcomes can be achieved in high-risk and low-risk patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery. The presented data support the suitability of laparoscopic surgery for this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 490
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery
    Feroci, Francesco
    Vannucchi, Andrea
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Cantafio, Stefano
    Garzi, Alessia
    Formisano, Giampaolo
    Scatizzi, Marco
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (13) : 3602 - 3610
  • [42] Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kowalewski, K. F.
    Seifert, L.
    Ali, S.
    Schmidt, M. W.
    Seide, S.
    Haney, C.
    Tapking, C.
    Shamiyeh, A.
    Kulu, Y.
    Hackert, T.
    Mueller-Stich, B. P.
    Nickel, F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 35 (01): : 81 - 95
  • [43] What happens after R1 resection in patients undergoing laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A study in 333 consecutive patients
    Debove, C.
    Maggiori, L.
    Chau, A.
    Kanso, F.
    Ferron, M.
    Panis, Y.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 17 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [44] Laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer
    Conti, Pietro
    La Greca, Giorgio
    Muratore, Andrea
    Trombatore, Giovanni
    GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA, 2022, 42 (04): : E18
  • [45] Totally Robotic Versus Totally Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Esen, Eren
    Aytac, Erman
    Agcaoglu, Orhan
    Zenger, Serkan
    Balik, Emre
    Baca, Bilgi
    Hamzaoglu, Ismail
    Karahasanoglu, Tayfun
    Bugra, Dursun
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (04): : 245 - 249
  • [46] Surgical and short-term oncological safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer
    Ng, Yvonne Y.
    Seow-En, Isaac
    Chok, Aik Yong
    Lee, Terence S.
    Palanisamy, Prasad
    Tan, Emile K.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (1-2) : 175 - 180
  • [47] Trans-perineal minimally invasive surgery during laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer
    Yasukawa, Daiki
    Hori, Tomohide
    Kadokawa, Yoshio
    Kato, Shigeru
    Aisu, Yuki
    Hasegawa, Suguru
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (02): : 437 - 447
  • [48] Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Raftopoulos, I.
    Reed, J. F., III
    Bergamaschi, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [49] Is the laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer superior to open surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis on short-term surgical outcomes
    Malczak, Piotr
    Mizera, Magdalena
    Torbicz, Grzegorz
    Witowski, Jan
    Major, Piotr
    Pisarska, Magdalena
    Wysocki, Michal
    Strzalka, Marcin
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2018, 13 (02) : 129 - 140
  • [50] Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study
    Kethman, William C.
    Harris, Alex H. S.
    Morris, Arden M.
    Shelton, Andrew
    Kirilcuk, Natalie
    Kin, Cindy
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (01) : 46 - 52