Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients

被引:6
|
作者
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis [1 ,2 ]
Figueiredo, Nuno [3 ]
Bhuvanakrishna, Thakshyanee [2 ]
Harper, Mick [1 ]
Parvaiz, Amjad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Hlth & Care Profess, St Michaels Rd, Portsmouth PO1 2PR, Hants, England
[2] Poole Hosp NHS Trust, Longfleet Mad, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[3] Champalimaud Fdn, Av Brasilia, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; High risk; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; COLORECTAL SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ASSISTED RESECTION; HARM SCORE; OPEN-LABEL; FOLLOW-UP; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01892-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Obesity, neoadjuvant-radiotherapy, tumour proximity to the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery are factors that might increase the intra-operative difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether patients with these 'high-risk' characteristics are subject to worse short- or long-term outcomes is debated. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and long-term clinical and oncological outcomes of patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery with any of these high-risk characteristics and compare them with patients that do not possess any of these high-risk features. Methods For the purpose of this study data from consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer resections between 2006 and 2016 from two centres were analysed. High-risk patients were defined as patients with either one of the following characteristics: BMI >= 30, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, tumour < 8 cm from the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery. Results A total of 313 patients were identified (227 high risk, 86 low risk). Short-term outcomes were similar between the two groups with the exception of blood loss and length of stay, which were higher in the high-risk group (10 vs 2.5 ml,p = 0.045; 7 vs 5 days,p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79.7% vs 79.8%,p = 0.757), disease-free survival (76.8% vs 69.3%,p = 0.175), distant disease-free interval (84.8% vs 79.7%,p = 0.231) and local recurrence-free interval (100%, 97.4%,p = 0.162) between the two groups. Conclusion Similar short- and long-term outcomes can be achieved in high-risk and low-risk patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery. The presented data support the suitability of laparoscopic surgery for this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 490
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Curative Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study on Long-term Outcome
    Portale, Giuseppe
    Valdegamberi, Alessandro
    Cavallin, Francesco
    Morabito, Alberto
    Frigo, Flavio
    Fiscon, Valentino
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (05): : 318 - 323
  • [32] Can Adequate Lymphadenectomy be Obtained by Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer? Results of a Case–Control Study in 200 Patients
    Samer Sara
    Gilles Poncet
    David Voirin
    Marie-Hélène Laverriere
    Daniel Anglade
    Jean-Luc Faucheron
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2010, 14 : 1244 - 1247
  • [33] Is the benefit of laparoscopy maintained in elderly patients undergoing rectal cancer resection? An analysis of 446 consecutive patients
    Manceau, Gilles
    Hain, Elisabeth
    Maggiori, Leon
    Mongin, Cecile
    la Denise, Justine Prost A.
    Panis, Yves
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (02): : 632 - 642
  • [34] Risk factors for suboptimal laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients
    Pere Planellas
    Helena Salvador
    Lídia Cornejo
    Maria Buxó
    Ramon Farrés
    Xavier Molina
    Albert Maroto
    Núria Ortega
    Jose Ignacio Rodríguez-Hermosa
    Antoni Codina-Cazador
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2021, 406 : 309 - 318
  • [35] Laparoscopic vs open abdominoperineal resection in the multimodality management of low rectal cancers
    Wang, Yu-Wei
    Huang, Li-Yong
    Song, Cheng-Li
    Zhuo, Chang-Hua
    Shi, De-Bing
    Cai, Guo-Xiang
    Xu, Ye
    Cai, San-Jun
    Li, Xin-Xiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (35) : 10174 - 10183
  • [36] Anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic resection of low and mid rectal cancer
    Shalaby, Mostafa
    Thabet, Waleed
    Rulli, Francesco
    Palmieri, Francesco
    Saraceno, Federica
    Capuano, Ilaria
    Buonomo, Oreste
    Giarratano, Gabriella
    Petrella, Giuseppe
    Morshed, Mosaad
    Farid, Mohamed
    Sileri, Pierpaolo
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2019, 90 (01) : 57 - 67
  • [37] Impact of a laparoscopic resection on the quality of life in rectal cancer patients: Results of 135 patients
    Jun Li
    Rong Chen
    Yong-Qiang Xu
    Xiao-Chen Wang
    Shu Zheng
    Su-Zhan Zhang
    Ke-Feng Ding
    Surgery Today, 2010, 40 : 917 - 922
  • [38] Laparoscopic Approach to Rectal Cancer-The New Standard?
    Hsieh, Christine
    Cologne, Kyle G.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [39] Can Adequate Lymphadenectomy be Obtained by Laparoscopic Resection in Rectal Cancer? Results of a Case-Control Study in 200 Patients
    Sara, Samer
    Poncet, Gilles
    Voirin, David
    Laverriere, Marie-Helene
    Anglade, Daniel
    Faucheron, Jean-Luc
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (08) : 1244 - 1247
  • [40] Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Open, Laparoscopic or Robotic Approach What is the treatment of choice in experienced minimally invasive surgical teams?
    Gavrila, Daniel
    Bitere, Ovidiu
    Droc, Gabriela
    Lacatus, Monica
    Minciuna, Corina
    Ilie, Vlad
    Trandafir, Bogdan
    Herlea, Vlad
    Tudor, Stefan
    Vasilescu, Catalin
    CHIRURGIA, 2021, 116 (05) : 573 - 582