Results of laparoscopic resection in high-risk rectal cancer patients

被引:6
|
作者
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis [1 ,2 ]
Figueiredo, Nuno [3 ]
Bhuvanakrishna, Thakshyanee [2 ]
Harper, Mick [1 ]
Parvaiz, Amjad [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Hlth & Care Profess, St Michaels Rd, Portsmouth PO1 2PR, Hants, England
[2] Poole Hosp NHS Trust, Longfleet Mad, Poole BH15 2JB, Dorset, England
[3] Champalimaud Fdn, Av Brasilia, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; High risk; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; COLORECTAL SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; ASSISTED RESECTION; HARM SCORE; OPEN-LABEL; FOLLOW-UP; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-020-01892-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Obesity, neoadjuvant-radiotherapy, tumour proximity to the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery are factors that might increase the intra-operative difficulty of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, whether patients with these 'high-risk' characteristics are subject to worse short- or long-term outcomes is debated. The aim of this study is to examine the short- and long-term clinical and oncological outcomes of patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery with any of these high-risk characteristics and compare them with patients that do not possess any of these high-risk features. Methods For the purpose of this study data from consecutive patients receiving laparoscopic rectal cancer resections between 2006 and 2016 from two centres were analysed. High-risk patients were defined as patients with either one of the following characteristics: BMI >= 30, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, tumour < 8 cm from the anal verge and previous abdominal surgery. Results A total of 313 patients were identified (227 high risk, 86 low risk). Short-term outcomes were similar between the two groups with the exception of blood loss and length of stay, which were higher in the high-risk group (10 vs 2.5 ml,p = 0.045; 7 vs 5 days,p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in 5-year overall survival (79.7% vs 79.8%,p = 0.757), disease-free survival (76.8% vs 69.3%,p = 0.175), distant disease-free interval (84.8% vs 79.7%,p = 0.231) and local recurrence-free interval (100%, 97.4%,p = 0.162) between the two groups. Conclusion Similar short- and long-term outcomes can be achieved in high-risk and low-risk patients receiving laparoscopic rectal surgery. The presented data support the suitability of laparoscopic surgery for this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 490
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic Versus Open Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Data Base
    Nussbaum, Daniel P.
    Speicher, Paul J.
    Ganapathi, Asvin M.
    Englum, Brian R.
    Keenan, Jeffrey E.
    Mantyh, Christopher R.
    Migaly, John
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (01) : 124 - 132
  • [22] Influence of conversion on the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer compared with primarily open resection
    Rickert, Alexander
    Herrle, Florian
    Doyon, Fabian
    Post, Stefan
    Kienle, Peter
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (12): : 4675 - 4683
  • [23] Prognostic effect of sarcopenia in patients undergoing laparoscopic rectal cancer resection
    Portale, Giuseppe
    Zuin, Matteo
    Spolverato, Ylenia Camilla
    Bartolotta, Patrizia
    Gregori, Dario
    Rettore, Carlo
    Cancian, Luca
    Morabito, Alberto
    Sava, Teodoro
    Fiscon, Valentino
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) : 1631 - 1637
  • [24] Laparoscopic rectal resection technique
    Anthuber, M.
    Kriening, B.
    Schrempf, M.
    Geissler, B.
    Maerkl, B.
    Rueth, S.
    CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (07): : 560 - 566
  • [25] Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a case-matched study
    Moreira, Andre da Luz
    Mor, Isabella
    Geisler, Daniel P.
    Remzi, Feza H.
    Kiran, Ravi P.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 278 - 283
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus open rectal cancer resection: oncologically equal?
    Mueller-Stich, B. P.
    Linke, G. R.
    Wagner, M.
    Steinemann, D. C.
    CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (07): : 552 - +
  • [27] Proficiency Level of Novice Technically Qualified Surgeons in Laparoscopic Rectal Resection
    Ichikawa, Nobuki
    Homma, Shigenori
    Yoshida, Tadashi
    Iijima, Hiroaki
    Kawamata, Futoshi
    Sibasaki, Susumu
    Kawamura, Hideki
    Minagawa, Nozomi
    Kamiizumi, You
    Fukasaku, Yasutomo
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (01): : 49 - 54
  • [28] Operative and long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer
    Bilgin, Ismail Ahmet
    Bas, Mustafa
    Aytac, Erman
    Benlice, Cigdem
    Esen, Eren
    Kirbiyik, Ebru
    Kiziltas, Cansu
    Aghayeva, Afag
    Ozben, Volkan
    Hamzaoglu, Ismail
    Karahasanoglu, Tayfun
    Baca, Bilgi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2020, 16 (06): : 1 - 10
  • [29] Laparoscopic Resection for Rectal Cancer: What Is the Evidence?
    Chan, Dedrick Kok-Hong
    Chong, Choon-Seng
    Lieske, Bettina
    Tan, Ker-Kan
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [30] Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients
    Hopkins, M. Benjamin
    Geiger, Timothy M.
    Bethurum, Alva J.
    Ford, Molly M.
    Muldoon, Roberta L.
    Beck, David E.
    Stewart, Thomas G.
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (06): : 2613 - 2622