Gestational diabetes screening with the new IADPSG guidelines: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:84
|
作者
Mission, John F. [1 ]
Ohno, Mika S. [2 ]
Cheng, Yvonne W. [3 ]
Caughey, Aaron B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cost effectiveness; decision analysis; gestational diabetes; International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group guidelines; 2-hour glucose tolerance test; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; MELLITUS; PREGNANCY; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; PREVENTION; MACROSOMIA; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.048
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the cost effectiveness of gestational diabetes mellitus screening using the new International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analytic model was built comparing routine screening with the 2-hour (2h) oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) vs the 1-hour glucose challenge test. All probabilities, costs, and benefits were derived from the literature. Base case, sensitivity analyses, and a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. RESULTS: Screening with the 2h OGTT was more expensive, more effective, and cost effective at $61,503/quality-adjusted life year. In a 1-way sensitivity analysis, the more inclusive IADPSG diagnostic approach remained cost effective as long as an additional 2.0% or more of patients were diagnosed and treated for gestational diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Screening at 24-28 weeks' gestational age under the new IADPSG guidelines with the 2h OGTT is expensive but cost effective in improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. How the health care system will provide expanded care to this group of women will need to be examined.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessing the incidence of gestational diabetes and neonatal outcomes using the IADPSG guidelines in comparison with the Carpenter and Coustan criteria in a Belgian general hospital
    Oriot, P.
    Selvais, P.
    Radikov, J.
    Jacobs, J. L.
    Gilleman, U.
    Loumaye, R.
    Fernandez, C.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2014, 69 (01) : 8 - 11
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of controlling gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review
    Najmiatul Fitria
    Antoinette D. I. van Asselt
    Maarten J. Postma
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2019, 20 : 407 - 417
  • [43] A systematic review on costs and cost-effectiveness of screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in women with prior gestational diabetes: Exploring uncharted territory
    Werbrouck, Amber
    Schmidt, Masja
    Putman, Koen
    Benhalima, Katrien
    Verhaeghe, Nick
    Annemans, Lieven
    Simoens, Steven
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 147 : 138 - 148
  • [44] Cost-effectiveness analysis of polycystic ovary syndrome management and the risk of gestational diabetes in pregnant women: a decision-tree model
    Alenzi, Ebtihag O.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (05) : 995 - 999
  • [45] A critical appraisal and potentially new conceptual approach to screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes
    Petrovic, Oleg
    Belci, Dragan
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 37 (06) : 691 - 699
  • [46] Diabetes Screening Through Community Pharmacies in England: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
    Wright, David
    Little, Richard
    Turner, David
    Thornley, Tracey
    PHARMACY, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [47] Cost and Cost-effectiveness of Large-scale Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Colorado
    McQueen, R. Brett
    Geno Rasmussen, Cristy
    Waugh, Kathleen
    Frohnert, Brigitte I.
    Steck, Andrea K.
    Yu, Liping
    Baxter, Judith
    Rewers, Marian
    DIABETES CARE, 2020, 43 (07) : 1496 - 1503
  • [48] Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Are the Criteria Proposed by the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Cost-Effective?
    Werner, Erika F.
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Zuckerwise, Lisa
    Reel, Michael
    Funai, Edmund F.
    Henderson, Janice
    Thung, Stephen F.
    DIABETES CARE, 2012, 35 (03) : 529 - 535
  • [49] Risk assessment, screening and prevention of breast cancer: A look at cost-effectiveness
    Lebovic, Gail S.
    Hollingsworth, Alan
    Feig, Stephen A.
    BREAST, 2010, 19 (04): : 260 - 267
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands
    Sankatsing, Valerie D. V.
    Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
    van Luijt, Paula A.
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    Fracheboud, Jacques
    de Koning, Harry J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (08) : 1990 - 1999