Gestational diabetes screening with the new IADPSG guidelines: a cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:84
|
作者
Mission, John F. [1 ]
Ohno, Mika S. [2 ]
Cheng, Yvonne W. [3 ]
Caughey, Aaron B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Santa Clara Valley Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Jose, CA 95128 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cost effectiveness; decision analysis; gestational diabetes; International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group guidelines; 2-hour glucose tolerance test; INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION; CESAREAN DELIVERY; MELLITUS; PREGNANCY; DIAGNOSIS; WOMEN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; PREVENTION; MACROSOMIA; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.048
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the cost effectiveness of gestational diabetes mellitus screening using the new International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: A decision analytic model was built comparing routine screening with the 2-hour (2h) oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) vs the 1-hour glucose challenge test. All probabilities, costs, and benefits were derived from the literature. Base case, sensitivity analyses, and a Monte Carlo simulation were performed. RESULTS: Screening with the 2h OGTT was more expensive, more effective, and cost effective at $61,503/quality-adjusted life year. In a 1-way sensitivity analysis, the more inclusive IADPSG diagnostic approach remained cost effective as long as an additional 2.0% or more of patients were diagnosed and treated for gestational diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Screening at 24-28 weeks' gestational age under the new IADPSG guidelines with the 2h OGTT is expensive but cost effective in improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. How the health care system will provide expanded care to this group of women will need to be examined.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness analysis of metformin versus insulin in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus
    Wu, Rui
    Li, Zuojing
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (1) : 135 - 144
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Neuropad device as a screening tool for early diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Rodriguez-Sanchez, B.
    Pena-Longobardo, L. M.
    Sinclair, A. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2020, 21 (03): : 335 - 349
  • [33] Review of the Screening Guidelines for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: How to Choose Wisely
    Bakshi, Ravleen Kaur
    Kumar, Akshay
    Gupta, Vandana
    Radhika, A. G.
    Misra, Puneet
    Bhardwaj, Pankaj
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (06) : 828 - 834
  • [34] Italian national guidelines for the screening of gestational diabetes: Time for a critical appraisal?
    Bianchi, C.
    de Gennaro, G.
    Romano, M.
    Battini, L.
    Aragona, M.
    Corfini, M.
    Del Prato, S.
    Bertolotto, A.
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 27 (08) : 717 - 722
  • [35] Level of implementation of guidelines on screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes: A national survey
    Pintaudi, Basilio
    Fresa, Raffaella
    Dalfra, Mariagrazia
    Marcone, Teresa
    Dodesini, Alessandro Roberto
    Napoli, Angela
    Bonomo, Matteo
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 113 : 48 - 52
  • [36] Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Kahn, Richard
    Alperin, Peter
    Eddy, David
    Borch-Johnsen, Knut
    Buse, John
    Feigelman, Justin
    Gregg, Edward
    Holman, Rury R.
    Kirkman, M. Sue
    Stern, Michael
    Tuomilehto, Jaakko
    Wareham, Nick J.
    LANCET, 2010, 375 (9723): : 1365 - 1374
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of type-2 diabetes screening in pharmacies in Iran
    Amirsadri, Mohammadreza
    Torkpour, Elahe
    RESEARCH IN PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (02) : 210 - 218
  • [38] Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis Prior to Delivery: A Cost-Effectiveness Study
    Knochenhauer, Hope E.
    Lim, Stephanie L.
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Dotters-Katz, Sarah K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2025, 42 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [39] SCREENING FOR SCOLIOSIS - A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    MONTGOMERY, F
    PERSSON, U
    BENONI, G
    WILLNER, S
    LINDGREN, B
    SPINE, 1990, 15 (02) : 67 - 70
  • [40] Cost-effectiveness analysis in mammography screening
    vonFournier, D
    RADIOLOGE, 1996, 36 (04): : 300 - 305