Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis in the Mammography Era

被引:31
作者
Chatterjee, Neal A. [1 ]
He, Yulei [2 ]
Keating, Nancy L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Diuis Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; RACIAL/ETHNIC DISPARITIES; HORMONE-THERAPY; INCIDENCE RATES; DISEASE STAGE; WOMEN; RACE; SURVIVAL; EXPLAIN; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2011.300550
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We assessed racial differences in breast cancer mortality by stage at diagnosis, since mammography became available. Methods. We calculated adjusted odds of distant (versus local or regional) tumors for 143 249 White and 13 571 Black women aged 50 to 69 years, diagnosed with breast cancer between 1982 and 2007 and living in a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results region. We compared linear trends in stage at diagnosis before and after 1998. Results. Distant-stage cancer was diagnosed in 5.8% of White and 10.2% of Black participants. The Black-White disparity in distant tumors narrowed until 1998 (1998 adjusted difference = 0.65%), before increasing. Between 1982 and 1997, the proportion of distant tumors decreased for Blacks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]/y = 0.973; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.960, 0.987) and Whites (AOR/y = 0.978; 95% CI = 0.973, 0.983), with no racial differences (P = .47). From 1998 to 2007, the odds of distant versus local or regional tumors increased for Blacks (AOR/y = 1.036; 95% CI = 1.013, 1.060) and Whites (AOR/y = 1.011; 95% CI = 1.002, 1.021); the rate of increase was greater for Blacks than Whites (P = .04). Conclusions. In the mammography era, racial disparities remain in stage at diagnosis. (Am J Public Health. 2013;103:170-176. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300550)
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 176
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Preventive care - Female cancer screening, 1996-2000
    Adams, EK
    Florence, CS
    Thorpe, KE
    Becker, ER
    Joski, PJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2003, 25 (04) : 301 - 307
  • [2] Racial Differences in Follow-Up of Abnormal Mammography Findings Among Economically Disadvantaged Women
    Adams, Swann A.
    Smith, Emily R.
    Hardin, James
    Prabhu-Das, Irene
    Fulton, Jeanette
    Hebert, James R.
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (24) : 5788 - 5797
  • [3] [Anonymous], ANN INTERN MED
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, CANCER
  • [5] [Anonymous], SMALL AREA HEALTH IN
  • [6] [Anonymous], SURVEILLANCE EPIDEMI
  • [7] Baines CJ, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P720
  • [8] Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review
    Biesheuvel, Corne
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Howard, Kirsten
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Irwig, Les
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12) : 1129 - 1138
  • [9] Bradley CJ, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P490
  • [10] Progress in cancer screening over a decade: Results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys
    Breen, N
    Wagener, DK
    Brown, ML
    Davis, WW
    Ballard-Barbash, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2001, 93 (22) : 1704 - 1713