Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa Mesh for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapsed

被引:15
|
作者
Cao, Ting-Ting [1 ]
Sun, Xiu-Li [1 ]
Wang, Shi-Yan [1 ]
Yang, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Jian-Liu [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
关键词
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Pelvic Organ Prolapse; Quality of Life; Recurrence; Small Intestinal Submucosa; VAGINAL WALL PROLAPSE; SYNTHETIC MESH; URINARY-INCONTINENCE; SIS GRAFT; REPAIR; WOMEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4103/0366-6999.192784
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major health concern that affects women. Surgeons have increasingly used prosthetic meshes to correct POP. However, the most common used is synthetic mesh, and absorbable mesh is less reported. This research aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS). Methods: Consecutive forty POP patients who met the inclusion criteria underwent pelvic reconstruction surgery with SIS between March 2012 and December 2013. The patients' clinical characteristics were recorded preoperatively. Surgical outcomes, measured by objective and subjective success rates, were investigated. We evaluated the quality of life (QOL) using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7). Sexual QOL was assessed by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire-12 (PISQ-12). Results: At postoperative 12 months, the subjective recurrence rate (7.5%) was much lower than the objective recurrence rate (40.0%). Postoperatively, no erosion was identified. One underwent a graft release procedure because of urinary retention, and one had anus sphincter reconstruction surgery due to defecation urgency. Another experienced posterior vaginal wall infection where the mesh was implanted, accompanied by severe vaginal pain. Estrogen cream relieved the pain. One patient with recurrence underwent a secondary surgery with Bard Mesh because of stage 3 anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Scoring system of PFDI-20 was from 59.150 +/- 13.143 preoperatively to 8.400 +/- 4.749 postoperatively and PFIQ-7 was from 73.350 +/- 32.281 to 7.150 +/- 3.110, while PISQ-12 was from 15.825 +/- 4.050 to 12.725 +/- 3.471. Conclusions: QOL and the degree of subjective satisfaction were significantly improved postoperatively. Anterior repair deserves more attention because of the higher recurrence rate. The long-term follow-up of the patient is warranted to draw firm conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:2603 / 2609
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterization of fibronectin derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa
    McPherson, TB
    Badylak, SF
    TISSUE ENGINEERING, 1998, 4 (01): : 75 - 83
  • [32] Identification and Characterization of Neurotrophic Factors in Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa
    Yang, Keum-Jin
    Park, Ki Cheol
    Choi, Hyunsu
    Choi, Jun-Hyuk
    Park, Sang-Ryoul
    Lee, Il-Woo
    Lee, Hyung-Jin
    TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (05) : 372 - 378
  • [33] Identification and characterization of neurotrophic factors in porcine small intestinal submucosa
    Keum-Jin Yang
    Ki Cheol Park
    Hyunsu Choi
    Jun-Hyuk Choi
    Sang-Ryoul Park
    Il-Woo Lee
    Hyung-Jin Lee
    Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2014, 11 : 372 - 378
  • [34] Enhanced bone regeneration using porcine small intestinal submucosa
    Suckow, MA
    Voytik-Harbin, SL
    Terril, LA
    Badylak, SF
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 1999, 12 (05) : 277 - 287
  • [35] Preparation and characterization of sponge using porcine small intestinal submucosa
    Shin, HW
    Kim, SH
    Jang, JW
    Kim, MS
    Cho, SH
    Lee, HB
    Khang, G
    POLYMER-KOREA, 2004, 28 (02) : 194 - 200
  • [36] Crosslinking decreases the hemocompatibility of decellularized, porcine small intestinal submucosa
    Glynn, Jeremy J.
    Polsin, Elizabeth G.
    Hinds, Monica T.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2015, 14 : 96 - 103
  • [37] Unsuccessful Alloplastic Esophageal Replacement With Porcine Small Intestinal Submucosa
    Doede, Thorsten
    Bondartschuk, Michail
    Joerck, Carsten
    Schulze, Eberhard
    Goernig, Matthias
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2009, 33 (04) : 328 - 333
  • [38] Porcine small intestinal submucosa as a carrier for skin flap prefabrication
    Zhang, F
    Zhu, C
    Oswald, T
    Lei, MP
    Lineaweaver, WC
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2003, 51 (05) : 488 - 492
  • [39] Identification and characterization of neurotrophic factors in porcine small intestinal submucosa
    Lee, I. W.
    Yang, K-J
    Park, K. C.
    Choi, H. S.
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 8 : 221 - 221
  • [40] Treatment of fistula-in-ano using a porcine small intestinal submucosa anal fistula plug
    Cintron, J. R.
    Abcarian, H.
    Chaudhry, V.
    Singer, M.
    Hunt, S.
    Birnbaum, E.
    Mutch, M. G.
    Fleshman, J.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2013, 17 (02) : 187 - 191